首页> 外文期刊>Influenza and other respiratory viruses. >Influenza outbreak control practices and the effectiveness of interventions in long‐term care facilities: a systematic review
【24h】

Influenza outbreak control practices and the effectiveness of interventions in long‐term care facilities: a systematic review

机译:流感暴发控制措施和长期护理设施中干预措施的有效性:系统回顾

获取原文
           

摘要

AbstractBackgroundEvaluation of influenza control measures frequently focuses on the efficacy of chemoprophylaxis and vaccination, while the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI) receives less emphasis. While influenza control measures are frequently reported for individual outbreaks, there have been few efforts to characterize the real-world effectiveness of these interventions across outbreaks.ObjectivesTo characterize influenza case and outbreak definitions and control measures reported by long-term care facilities (LTCFs) of elderly adults and estimate the reduction in influenza-like illness (ILI) attack rates due to chemoprophylaxis and NPI.MethodsWe conducted a literature search in PubMed including English-language studies reporting influenza outbreaks among elderly individuals in LTCFs. A Bayesian hierarchical logistic regression model estimated the effects of control measures on ILI attack rates.ResultsOf 654 articles identified in the literature review, 37 articles describing 60 influenza outbreaks met the inclusion criteria. Individuals in facilities where chemoprophylaxis was used were significantly less likely to develop influenza A or B than those in facilities with no interventions [odds ratio (OR) 0·48, 95% CI: 0·28, 0·84]. Considered by drug class, adamantanes significantly reduced infection risk (OR 0·22, 95% CI: 0·12, 0·42), while neuraminidase inhibitors did not show a significant effect. Although NPI showed no significant effect, the results suggest that personal protective equipment may produce modest protective effects.ConclusionsOur results indicate pharmaceutical control measures have the clearest reported protective effect in LTCFs. Non-pharmaceutical approaches may be useful; however, most data were from observational studies and standardized reporting or well-conducted clinical trials of NPI are needed to more precisely measure these effects.
机译:摘要背景流感控制措施的评估经常侧重于化学预防和疫苗接种的效力,而非药物干预措施(NPI)的效力则受到较少的重视。虽然经常报告针对个别暴发的流感控制措施,但很少有工作来描述这些暴发措施在现实中的实际效果。目标是为了描述流感病例和暴发的定义以及长期护理机构(LTCF)报告的控制措施方法我们在PubMed进行了文献检索,包括英语研究,这些研究报告了LTCFs中老年人的流感暴发。贝叶斯分级Logistic回归模型评估了控制措施对ILI发病率的影响。结果在文献综述中确定的654篇文章中,有37篇描述60例流感暴发符合纳入标准。与没有干预措施的设施相比,使用化学预防措施的设施中的人患甲型或乙型流感的可能性要低得多[几率(OR)0·48,95%CI:0·28、0·84]。按药物类别考虑,金刚烷酮可显着降低感染风险(OR 0·22,95%CI:0·12、0·42),而神经氨酸酶抑制剂则无明显作用。尽管NPI没有显示出明显的作用,但结果表明个人防护设备可能产生适度的防护作用。结论我们的结果表明,药物控制措施对LTCF的防护作用最清楚。非药物方法可能有用。但是,大多数数据来自观察性研究,需要标准化报告或进行良好的NPI临床试验才能更精确地测量这些影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号