首页> 外文期刊>Infrastructure Complexity >Estimating economic loss from cascading infrastructure failure: a perspective on modelling interdependency
【24h】

Estimating economic loss from cascading infrastructure failure: a perspective on modelling interdependency

机译:估算级联故障导致的经济损失:建模相互依赖关系的观点

获取原文
       

摘要

Abstract Infrastructure failure can cause significant disruption of economic activity. The size of economic loss is a direct function of the interdependencies between infrastructure and economic systems raising important questions about infrastructure vulnerability and resilience. Economic theory is important in this regard as it makes a distinction between damage to infrastructure (stock) and how this may transfer to losses in economic productivity (flow). In order to capture the economic consequences of infrastructure failure, various economic models have been proposed to represent the multimodal complex networks and capture the effects of cascading infrastructure failure. There is still no consensus on the correct approach for estimating economic loss. The method commonly known as input-output analysis has gained the most attention in recent years for its ability to model indirect or higher-order economic losses. The typical input-output approach has spawned an entire field of related models which include: the inoperability input-output model (IIM); Ghosh supply-side model; dynamic input-output models; key-linkages analysis; as well as inventory based models amongst others. Amongst the various methods used to model infrastructure failure this paper identifies the assumptions and shortcomings that must be overcome to produce better estimates of economic loss. Firstly, critical infrastructure systems are connected to the economy through both physical and economic linkages. Models need to capture both types of linkage to accurately represent how cascading infrastructure failure will lead to economic loss and then how sectoral losses may have an indirect impact on infrastructure systems. Secondly, input-output based approaches assume that the economic structure within an economy remains stable during a disaster and throughout the recovery process. New models are required that are able to capture substitution of goods and structural change within an economy. Thirdly, models of economic loss are generally deterministic in nature and thus give no indication about the uncertainty behind model-based estimates. Economic loss estimates using probability theory and methods such as Monte-Carlo simulations or fuzzy logic may prove to be important avenues for quantifying uncertainty in economic loss estimates resulting from infrastructure failure.
机译:摘要基础设施故障可能会导致经济活动的严重中断。经济损失的规模是基础设施与经济系统之间相互依存关系的直接函数,从而引发了有关基础设施脆弱性和弹性的重要问题。在这方面,经济学理论很重要,因为它区分了对基础设施(股票)的损害与这种损害如何转移到经济生产率(流量)的损失之间。为了捕获基础设施故障的经济后果,已经提出了各种经济模型来表示多模式复杂网络并捕获级联基础设施故障的影响。关于估计经济损失的正确方法仍未达成共识。近年来,通常被称为投入产出分析的方法因其对间接或更高阶经济损失进行建模的能力而备受关注。典型的输入输出方法催生了相关模型的整个领域,这些模型包括:不可操作性输入输出模型(IIM);以及Ghosh供应方模型;动态投入产出模型;关键链接分析;以及基于库存的模型等。在用于建模基础设施故障的各种方法中,本文确定了要获得更好的经济损失估算所必须克服的假设和不足。首先,关键的基础设施系统通过物理和经济联系与经济联系在一起。模型需要捕获两种类型的链接,以准确表示级联的基础设施故障将如何导致经济损失,然后部门损失如何对基础设施系统产生间接影响。其次,基于投入产出的方法假设一个经济体内的经济结构在灾难期间和整个恢复过程中保持稳定。需要新的模型以捕捉经济中商品的替代和结构变化。第三,经济损失模型通常是确定性的,因此无法表示基于模型的估计背后的不确定性。使用概率理论和方法(例如蒙特卡洛模拟或模糊逻辑)进行的经济损失估算可能是量化因基础设施故障导致的经济损失估算的不确定性的重要途径。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号