首页> 外文期刊>Infectious Diseases and Therapy >Open-Label Randomized Trial of Early Clinical Outcomes of Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Vancomycin for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections at Risk of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
【24h】

Open-Label Randomized Trial of Early Clinical Outcomes of Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Vancomycin for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections at Risk of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

机译:头孢洛林福沙米尔与万古霉素治疗急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的早期临床疗效的开放标签随机试验具有耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的风险

获取原文
           

摘要

IntroductionAcute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) remain among the most common infectious processes seen in the clinical setting. For patients with complicated ABSSSIs deemed to require intravenous antibiotics, vancomycin remains the mainstay therapy. Ceftaroline has been shown to be non-inferior to vancomycin and may result in faster resolution of signs of infection. MethodsMulticenter, prospective, open-label, randomized trial of ceftaroline versus vancomycin for the treatment of adult patients admitted for management of ABSSSIs from April 2012 to May 2016; 166 patients in the clinically evaluable (CE) group were needed to determine a 20% difference in primary outcome of clinical response at day 2 or 3 of antibiotics. Clinical response was defined as cessation of spread of lesion and improvement in systemic signs/symptoms of infection. A secondary outcome was a?≥?20% reduction in lesion size at day 2 or 3 of antibiotics. ResultsOne hundred seventy-four patients were enrolled in the intention-to-treat (ITT) group and 108 were CE. Among CE patients, 54 were randomized to ceftaroline and 54 to vancomycin. Baseline characteristics were similar except patients in the ceftaroline arm were older and had a non-significantly higher degree of comorbidities (median Charlson score 2 vs. 4, respectively). Cellulitis was the most common type of ABSSSI (85.2% vs. 79.6%, respectively). Rapid diagnostic testing of available cultures ( n =?55) demonstrated high agreement with clinical microbiology for identification of Staphylococcus aureus (100%) and MRSA (100%). There was no significant difference in primary outcome of day 2 or 3 clinical response (50.0% vs. 51.9%). ConclusionEarly clinical response between vancomycin- and ceftaroline-treated ABSSSIs was similar. Patients with ABSSSIs rarely remained hospitalized for 2–3?days, thus limiting our ability to critically assess clinical outcomes. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02582203. FundingAllergan plc.
机译:简介急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染(ABSSSI)仍然是临床环境中最常见的感染过程。对于复杂的ABSSSI患者,认为需要静脉使用抗生素,万古霉素仍然是主要治疗手段。头孢洛林已被证明不逊于万古霉素,并可能导致更快地解决感染迹象。方法从2012年4月至2016年5月,对头孢洛林与万古霉素治疗接受ABSSSI治疗的成年患者进行多中心,前瞻性,开放标签,随机试验;临床可评估(CE)组中的166名患者需要确定在抗生素的第2天或第3天临床反应的主要结果中有20%的差异。临床反应被定义为病灶扩散的停止和系统性体征/感染症状的改善。次要结果是在抗生素的第2天或第3天病变大小减少≥20%。结果入选意向治疗(ITT)组174例,其中CE为108例。在CE患者中,有54例被随机分配给头孢洛林,有54例被分配给万古霉素。基线特征相似,除了头孢洛林组的患者年龄较大且合并症的程度无明显差异(Charlson中位数分别为2分和4分)。蜂窝组织炎是最常见的ABSSSI类型(分别为85.2%和79.6%)。对可用培养物的快速诊断测试(n = 55)表明与临床微生物学鉴定金黄色葡萄球菌(100%)和MRSA(100%)的一致性很高。在第2天或第3天的临床反应的主要结局方面没有显着差异(50.0%对51.9%)。结论万古霉素和头孢洛林治疗的ABSSSI之间的早期临床反应相似。患有ABSSSI的患者很少住院超过2-3天,因此限制了我们严格评估临床结果的能力。 Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov标识符,NCT02582203。资金Allergan plc。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号