...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Ophthalmology >Microkeratome-assisted ultrathin Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: A randomized trial comparing single-pass versus double-pass technique
【24h】

Microkeratome-assisted ultrathin Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: A randomized trial comparing single-pass versus double-pass technique

机译:微角膜刀辅助超薄Descemet的剥离自动内皮角膜移植术:比较单次通过与两次通过技术的随机试验

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose: To compare the outcomes of two techniques, for preparation of microkeratome-assisted ultrathin grafts for Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). Methods: The study involved 20 eyes of 20 patients with pseudophakic bullous keratopathy, randomized into two groups. Group 1 eyes underwent microkeratome-assisted DSAEK using the single-pass technique for lenticule preparation, whereas group 2 eyes underwent microkeratome-assisted DSAEK using the double-pass technique. Patients were followed up till 6 months, postoperatively. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at final follow-up was considered as the primary outcome measure, whereas graft thickness (GT) contrast sensitivity and endothelial cell loss were considered as the secondary outcome measures. A P value of 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: Baseline characteristics of two groups were comparable. The mean central GT was comparable in both groups at 6 months follow-up [group 1: 98 ± 24.46 μm, group 2: 129 ± 31.46 μm (P = 0.18)]. Both groups fared equally in terms of BCVA (P = 0.33). Contrast sensitivity was significantly better in group 1 eyes (P = 0.045). A statistically significant negative correlation was found between postoperative BCVA and postoperative GT (R = ?0.728, P = 0.016). The percentage endothelial cell loss was slightly higher in group 2 eyes, although not statistically significant. Two eyes in group 2 experienced complications during lenticule preparation. None of the eye experienced any complication in the postoperative period. Conclusion: Both techniques provided grafts with comparable thickness and endothelial cell loss and were associated with comparable BCVA, at final follow-up visit. The contrast sensitivity was, however, better in eyes receiving grafts prepared with the single-pass technique.
机译:目的:为了比较两种技术的效果,以制备用于Descemet剥离自动内皮角膜移植术(DSAEK)的微型角膜刀辅助超薄移植物。方法:本研究涉及20例假晶状体大疱性角膜病变患者的20只眼,随机分为两组。组1的眼睛使用单次通过技术进行微角膜刀辅助DSAEK的准备,而组2的眼睛使用双通过技术进行微角膜刀辅助的DSAEK。术后随访患者至6个月。最终随访时将最佳矫正视敏度(BCVA)视为主要结局指标,而将移植物厚度(GT)对比敏感度和内皮细胞损失视为次要结局指标。 P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:两组的基线特征具有可比性。在6个月的随访中,两组的平均中央GT均相当[组1:98±24.46μm,组2:129±31.46μm(P = 0.18)]。两组的BCVA表现均等(P = 0.33)。第1组眼睛的对比敏感性明显更好(P = 0.045)。术后BCVA与术后GT之间存在统计学上的显着负相关(R = 0.728,P = 0.016)。第2组眼睛的内皮细胞损失百分比略高,尽管无统计学意义。第2组的两只眼睛在小孔准备期间发生并发症。术后没有眼睛出现任何并发症。结论:在最终的随访中,这两种技术都为移植物提供了相当的厚度和内皮细胞损失,并与相当的BCVA相关。但是,接受单程技术制备的移植物的眼睛的对比敏感性更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号