首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Ophthalmology >A literature review and update on the incidence and microbiology spectrum of postcataract surgery endophthalmitis over past two decades in India
【24h】

A literature review and update on the incidence and microbiology spectrum of postcataract surgery endophthalmitis over past two decades in India

机译:印度过去二十年来白内障术后眼内炎的发病率和微生物学范围的文献综述和最新进展

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to review the incidence and microbiology of acute postcataract surgery endophthalmitis in India. Methods: Systematic review of English-language PubMed referenced articles on endophthalmitis in India published in the past 21 years (January 1992–December 2012), and retrospective chart review of 2 major eye care facilities in India in the past 5 years (January 2010–December 2014) were done. The incidence data were collected from articles that described “in-house” endophthalmitis and the microbiology data were collected from all articles. Both incidence and microbiological data of endophthalmitis were collected from two large eye care facilities. Case reports were excluded, except for the articles on cluster infection. Results: Six of 99 published articles reported the incidence of “in-house” acute postcataract surgery endophthalmitis, 8 articles reported the microbiology spectrum, and 11 articles described cluster infection. The clinical endophthalmitis incidence was between 0.04% and 0.15%. In two large eye care facilities, the clinical endophthalmitis incidence was 0.08% and 0.16%; the culture proven endophthalmitis was 0.02% and 0.08%. Gram-positive cocci (44%-64.8%; commonly, Staphylococcus species), and Gram-negative bacilli (26.2%–43%; commonly Pseudomonas species) were common bacteria in south India. Fungi (16.7%-70%; commonly Aspergillus flavus) were the common organisms in north India. Pseudomonas aeruginosa (73.3%) was the major organism in cluster infections. Conclusions: The incidence of postcataract surgery clinical endophthalmitis in India is nearly similar to the world literature. There is a regional difference in microbiological spectrum. A registry with regular and uniform national reporting will help formulate region specific management guidelines.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是回顾印度急性白内障术后眼内炎的发生率和微生物学。方法:过去21年(1992年1月至2012年12月)发表的有关印度眼内炎的英文PubMed参考文章的系统评价,以及过去5年(2010年1月至2010年1月)印度2家主要眼保健机构的回顾性图表回顾。 2014年12月)完成。从描述“内部”眼内炎的文章中收集发病率数据,并从所有文章中收集微生物学数据。眼内炎的发病率和微生物学数据均来自两家大型眼科医疗机构。除有关簇感染的文章外,病例报告均被排除在外。结果:99篇发表的文章中有6篇报道了“内部”急性白内障手术后眼内炎的发生率,8篇报道了微生物学谱,11篇描述了簇感染。临床眼内炎的发生率在0.04%至0.15%之间。在两家大型眼科设施中,临床眼内炎的发生率分别为0.08%和0.16%;培养证实的眼内炎分别为0.02%和0.08%。革兰氏阳性球菌(44%-64.8%;葡萄球菌常见)和革兰氏阴性杆菌(26.2%–43%;假单胞菌常见)是印度南部的常见细菌。真菌(16.7%-70%;常见为黄曲霉)是印度北部的常见生物。铜绿假单胞菌(73.3%)是簇感染中的主要生物。结论:印度白内障手术后临床眼内炎的发生率与世界文献几乎相似。微生物谱存在区域差异。具有定期和统一国家报告的注册管理机构将帮助制定特定于区域的管理指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号