首页> 外文期刊>Illawarra Unity - Journal of the Illawarra Branch of the Australian Society for the Study of Labour History >Modernity’s Discontents: Esmonde Higgins and James Rawling as Labour Intellectuals
【24h】

Modernity’s Discontents: Esmonde Higgins and James Rawling as Labour Intellectuals

机译:现代性的不满:埃斯蒙德·希金斯(Esmonde Higgins)和詹姆斯·罗林(James Rawling)作为劳动知识分子

获取原文
           

摘要

In the first half of the twentieth century, two young men from different backgrounds broke with the ruling culture in Australia and became labour intellectuals.2 Why did this happen? Was there some disruptive element in their early engaement with ruling ideas – perhaps in their family life – that made their defection possible? And how did the break occur? Was it due perhaps to a moment of intellectual enlightenment, in which powerful new ideas captured the mind, or did it also involve a coming together of history and biography, a moment of concentrated exposure to modernity’s discontents at the same time as disorienting personal crises? Further, in their commitment to communism, how did they understand their political practice as intellectuals? And how should we understand it? Did it draw on their previous training and experiences? As intellectuals they were ‘modern’ men, but what kind of modernists were they?
机译:在20世纪上半叶,两个来自不同背景的年轻人闯入了澳大利亚的统治文化,成为了劳动知识分子。2为什么会这样?他们早期参与统治思想的过程中是否存在破坏性因素(也许在他们的家庭生活中),从而使叛逃成为可能?中断是如何发生的?是由于一时的思想启蒙,其中有力的新思想抓住了思想,还是因为历史和传记的融合,一时集中了现代性的不满情绪,同时又使个人危机迷失了方向?此外,在对共产主义的承诺中,他们如何理解自己作为知识分子的政治实践?我们应该如何理解呢?是否借鉴了他们以前的培训和经验?作为知识分子,他们是“现代”人,但是他们是什么样的现代主义者?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号