...
首页> 外文期刊>Implementation Science >Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation research
【24h】

Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation research

机译:用于实施研究的理论领域框架调查问卷的判别内容有效性

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background To improve the implementation of innovations in healthcare settings, it is important to understand factors influencing healthcare professionals’ behaviors. We aimed to develop a generic questionnaire in English and in Dutch assessing the 14 domains of behavioral determinants from the revised TDF (Cane et al., 2012) that can be tailored to suit different targets, actions, contexts, and times of interest, and to investigate questionnaire items’ discriminant content validity. Methods We identified existing questionnaires including items assessing constructs within TDF domains and developed new items where needed. Nineteen judges allocated 79 items to one or more TDF domains. One-sample t-tests were used to examine the discriminant content validity of each item, i.e., whether items measured intended domains or whether items measured a combination of domains. Results We identified items judged to discriminately measure 11 out of 14 domains. Items measuring the domains Reinforcement, Goals, and Behavioral regulation were judged to measure a combination of domains. Conclusions We have developed a questionnaire in English and in Dutch able to discriminately assess the majority of TDF domains. The results partly support Cane et al.’s (2012) 14-domain validation of the TDF and suggest that Michie et al.’s (2005) 12-domain original version might be more applicable in developing a TDF-based questionnaire. The identified items provide a robust basis for developing a questionnaire to measure TDF-based determinants of healthcare professionals’ implementation behaviors to suit different targets, actions, contexts, and times. Future research should investigate the concurrent and predictive validity and reliability of such a questionnaire in practice.
机译:背景信息为了改善医疗保健环境中创新的实施,了解影响医疗保健专业人员行为的因素非常重要。我们旨在开发一种英文和荷兰文的通用问卷,以评估修订后的TDF(Cane等人,2012)中的行为决定因素的14个领域,这些领域可以针对不同的目标,行动,环境和感兴趣的时间进行定制,以及调查问卷项目的判别内容的有效性。方法我们确定了现有的问卷,包括评估TDF域内结构的项目,并在需要时开发了新项目。 19名法官将79个项目分配给一个或多个TDF域。使用一次样本t检验来检验每个项目的判别内容有效性,即,项目是否测量了预期的域或项目是否测量了域的组合。结果我们确定了在14个领域中有11个被判别的项目。衡量领域强化,目标和行为规范的项目被判断为衡量领域的组合。结论我们已经用英语和荷兰语制作了一份问卷,能够区分大多数TDF域。结果部分支持Cane等人(2012)对TDF的14个域的验证,并暗示Michie等人(2005)对12个域的原始版本可能更适用于开发基于TDF的问卷。所确定的项目为开发调查表以衡量基于TDF的医疗保健专业人员的实施行为的决定因素提供了坚实的基础,这些行为适合于不同的目标,行动,环境和时间。未来的研究应该在实践中调查这种问卷的同时性和预测性有效性和可靠性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号