...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian journal of dermatology, venereology and leprology >Efficacy and safety of a nano-emulsion gel formulation of adapalene 0.1% and clindamycin 1% combination in acne vulgaris: A randomized, open label, active-controlled, multicentric, phase IV clinical trial
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of a nano-emulsion gel formulation of adapalene 0.1% and clindamycin 1% combination in acne vulgaris: A randomized, open label, active-controlled, multicentric, phase IV clinical trial

机译:寻常痤疮中0.1%的阿达帕林和1%的克林霉素组合的纳米乳胶制剂的疗效和安全性:一项随机,开放标签,主动控制,多中心,IV期临床试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Acne vulgaris is a very common skin disease with a significant detrimental effect on the quality of life of the patients. Aims: To assess the comparative efficacy and safety of a nano-emulsion gel formulation of adapalene and clindamycin combination with its conventional formulation in the treatment of acne vulgaris of the face. It was a prospective, randomized, open label, active-controlled, multicentric, clinical trial. Methods: Eligible patients suffering from acne vulgaris of the face were randomized to receive once-daily treatment with a nano-emulsion gel or conventional gel formulation of adapalene 0.1% and clindamycin (as phosphate) 1% combination for 12 weeks. Total, inflammatory and noninflammatory lesion counts, with grading of acne severity were carried out on a monthly basis. Safety assessments were done to determine the comparative local and systemic tolerability. Two-tailed significance testing was carried out with appropriate statistical tests, and P-values 0.05 were considered as significant. Results: 209/212 patients enrolled in the study were eligible for efficacy and safety assessments in both nano-emulsion gel (118/119 patients) and conventional gel (91/93 patients) groups. Significantly better reductions in total (79.7% vs. 62.7%), inflammatory (88.7% vs. 71.4%) and noninflammatory (74.9% vs. 58.4%) lesions were reported with the nano-emulsion gel as compared to the conventional gel (P 0.001 for all). Mean acne severity score also reduced significantly more with the nano-emulsion formulation (1.9 ± 0.9 vs. 1.4 ± 1.0; P 0.001) than the comparator. Significantly lower incidence and lesser intensity of adverse events like local irritation (4.2% vs. 19.8%; P 0.05) and erythema (0.8% vs. 9.9%; P 0.05) were recorded with the nano-emulsion gel. Conclusions: The nano-emulsion gel formulation of adapalene and clindamycin combination appears to be more efficacious and better tolerated than the conventional formulation for the treatment of acne vulgaris in Indian patients. Further studies can elucidate the comparative treatment benefits of this nano-emulsion gel formulation.
机译:背景:寻常痤疮是一种非常常见的皮肤疾病,对患者的生活质量具有重大不利影响。目的:评估阿达帕林和克林霉素的纳米乳胶制剂及其常规制剂在治疗面部寻常痤疮中的相对疗效和安全性。这是一项前瞻性,随机,开放标签,主动控制,多中心的临床试验。方法:将符合条件的面部痤疮患者随机分配,接受纳米乳胶或传统阿达帕林0.1%和克林霉素(磷酸盐)1%组合的常规凝胶制剂每日一次治疗,持续12周。每月进行痤疮严重程度分级的总的,炎性和非炎性病变计数。进行了安全评估,以确定相对的局部和全身耐受性。采用适当的统计检验进行了两尾显着性检验,P值<0.05被认为是显着的。结果:参加本研究的209/212位患者符合纳米乳胶(118/119位患者)和常规凝胶(91/93位患者)组的疗效和安全性评估要求。与传统的凝胶相比,纳米乳胶的总病变减少率(79.7%vs. 62.7%),炎性病变(88.7%vs. 71.4%)和非炎性病变(74.9%vs. 58.4%)显着改善。 <0.001)。纳米乳剂配方的平均痤疮严重程度得分也显着降低(1.9±0.9 vs. 1.4±1.0; P <0.001)。用纳米乳胶记录到的不良事件发生率显着降低,而诸如局部刺激的不良事件强度降低(4.2%vs. 19.8%; P <0.05)和红斑(0.8%vs. 9.9%; P <0.05)。结论:阿达帕林和克林霉素组合的纳米乳胶制剂比常规制剂治疗印度寻常痤疮似乎更有效,耐受性更好。进一步的研究可以阐明这种纳米乳胶配方的比较治疗优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号