首页> 外文期刊>Implementation Science >The concept of mechanism from a realist approach: a scoping review to facilitate its operationalization in public health program evaluation
【24h】

The concept of mechanism from a realist approach: a scoping review to facilitate its operationalization in public health program evaluation

机译:来自现实主义方法的机制概念:范围界定审查,以促进其在公共卫生计划评估中的操作

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Public health interventions are complex by nature, and their evaluation requires unpacking their intervention logic and their interactions with open social systems. By focusing on the interrelationships between context, mechanism, and outcome, Pawson and Tilley’s realist approach appears a promising innovation for public health-related evaluation works. However, and as expected of any methodological innovation, this approach is being constructed gradually by answering the multiple challenges to its operationalization that fall in its path. One of these challenges, users of this approach agree on, is the necessity of clarifying its key concept of mechanism. Method We first collected the definitions of mechanism from published works of Pawson and colleagues. Secondly, a scoping review was conducted to identify the ones quoted by users of the realist approach for evaluating public health interventions (1997–2012). We then appraised the clarity and precision of this concept against the three dimensions defined by Daigneault and Jacobs “term, sense and referent.” Results Of the 2344 documents identified in the scoping review, 49 documents were included. Term: Users of the realist approach use adjectives qualifying the term mechanism that were not specifically endorsed by Pawson and colleagues. Sense: None of the attributes stated by Pawson and colleagues has been listed in all of the documents analyzed, and some contributions clarified its attributes. Referent: The concept of mechanism within a realist approach can be ascribed to theory-based evaluation, complex social interventions, and critical realism. Conclusion This review led us to reconsider the concept of mechanism within the realist approach by confronting the theoretical stance of its proponents to the practical one of its users. This resulted in a clearer, more precise definition of the concept of mechanism which may in turn trigger further improvements in the way the realist approach is applied in evaluative practice in public health and potentially beyond. A mechanism is hidden but real, is an element of reasoning and reactions of agents in regard to the resources available in a given context to bring about changes through the implementation of an intervention, and evolves within an open space-time and social system of relationships.
机译:背景公共卫生干预措施本质上是复杂的,其评估需要分解其干预措施逻辑及其与开放社会系统的互动。通过关注上下文,机制和结果之间的相互关系,Pawson和Tilley的现实主义方法似乎是与公共卫生相关的评估工作有希望的创新。但是,正如任何方法创新所期望的那样,该方法正在通过应对其运行中遇到的多种挑战逐步构建。使用此方法的用户一致认为,这些挑战之一是必须阐明其关键机制概念。方法我们首先从Pawson及其同事的已发表著作中收集了机制的定义。其次,进行了范围界定审查,以确定使用真实方法评估公共卫生干预措施的用户所引用的范围(1997-2012年)。然后,我们对照戴格诺和雅各布斯定义的“术语,意义和对象”三个维度,评估了该概念的清晰度和精确性。结果在范围界定审查中确定的2344个文件中,包括49个文件。术语:现实主义方法的用户使用限定词机制的形容词,但并未得到Pawson及其同事的特别认可。含义:在所有分析的文档中,都没有列出Pawson及其同事所陈述的属性,有些贡献澄清了其属性。参考对象:现实主义方法中的机制概念可以归因于基于理论的评估,复杂的社会干预和批判性现实主义。结论这篇综述使我们在现实主义方法中重新考虑了机制的概念,方法是将其支持者的理论立场与实际用户的立场相冲突。这导致对机制的概念有了更清晰,更精确的定义,进而可能引发对现实主义方法在公共卫生乃至其他评估实践中的应用方式的进一步改进。一种机制是隐藏的但是真实的,是主体针对给定上下文中可用资源进行推理和做出反应的要素,以通过实施干预来带来变化,并在开放的时空和社会关系系统中发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号