...
首页> 外文期刊>Implementation Science >The implementation of academic detailing and its effectiveness on appropriate prescribing of pain relief medication: a real-world cluster randomized trial in Belgian general practices
【24h】

The implementation of academic detailing and its effectiveness on appropriate prescribing of pain relief medication: a real-world cluster randomized trial in Belgian general practices

机译:学术细节的实施及其在适当处方镇痛药物上的有效性:比利时一般实践中的一项现实世界的随机试验

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundIn Belgium, the debate about the effect of the national academic detailing service (ADS) on prescribing quality in general practice is ongoing. In order to evaluate both the implementation strategies of the ADS and its effectiveness on appropriate prescribing of pain relief medication, we conducted a real-world cluster randomized controlled trial (cRCT). MethodsIn a pragmatic cRCT, all Belgian general practices previously visited by Farmaka were assessed for eligibility and randomized. Only practices randomized to the intervention group were invited for an academic detailing visit on appropriate prescribing of pain relief medication. GPs were unaware of the study, ensuring the production of real-world evidence but were given the option to opt out from the analysis. An objective outcome assessment was obtained using routinely collected reimbursement data. Primary outcomes were the proportion of patients reimbursed for an analgesic or NSAID, the defined daily dose of paracetamol per patient per month, the proportion of patients reimbursed for a recommended NSAID among those reimbursed for any NSAID and the proportion of patients reimbursed for both an NSAID and a proton pump inhibitor among those reimbursed for an NSAID. The impact of practice, GP and academic detailer characteristics were also assessed. ResultsThree thousand five hundred twenty-nine general practices (4530 GPs) were eligible and randomized. One thousand six hundred ninety-eight practices (2171 GPs) in the intervention group and one thousand seven hundred three (2163 GPs) in the control group were included in the analysis. The intervention had a significant impact on the proportion of patients reimbursed for a recommended NSAID among those reimbursed for any NSAID (increase in odds (95% CI): 19% (10–29%)). A clear impact on other outcomes could not be detected. Additionally, we showed that the characteristics of the academic detailers might impact the effectiveness of the visit. ConclusionsNational implementation of academic detailing in Belgian general practices provided by Farmaka significantly improved the proportion of recommended NSAIDs prescribed by GPs, but not other outcomes related to appropriate prescribing of pain relief medication. Trial registration NCT01761864 . Registered 2 January 2013.
机译:背景技术在比利时,有关国家学术详细资料服务(ADS)对一般实践中的质量规定的影响的辩论仍在进行中。为了评估ADS的实施策略及其在适当处方止痛药上的有效性,我们进行了一项真实世界的群集随机对照试验(cRCT)。方法在一个实用的cRCT中,对Farmaka以前访问过的所有比利时通用实践进行资格评估并随机分组。只有随机分配给干预组的实践才被邀请就止痛药物的适当处方进行学术详细访问。全科医生不了解这项研究,无法确保提供真实证据,但可以选择退出分析。使用常规收集的报销数据获得了客观的结果评估。主要结局是报销镇痛药或NSAID的患者比例,每位患者每月扑热息痛的确定每日剂量,报销任何NSAID的患者中报销推荐NSAID的患者比例以及报销两种NSAID的患者比例报销过NSAID的人中还有一个质子泵抑制剂。还评估了实践,GP和学术详细信息特征的影响。结果395例全科医师(4530名普通医师)符合条件并随机分组。分析中包括干预组的168例(2171 GP)和对照组的173例(2163 GP)。干预措施对报销任何NSAID的患者中推荐NSAID的患者比例有重大影响(赔率增加(95%CI):19%(10–29%))。无法检测到对其他结果的明显影响。此外,我们表明学术详细信息的特征可能会影响访问的有效性。结论在法玛卡(Rakaka)提供的比利时一般实践中对学术细节的全国性实施显着提高了全科医生处方推荐的非甾体抗炎药的比例,但并未带来与适当处方镇痛药有关的其他结果。试用注册号NCT01761864。 2013年1月2日注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号