首页> 外文期刊>Implementation Science >Examining the ethical and social issues of health technology design through the public appraisal of prospective scenarios: a study protocol describing a multimedia-based deliberative method
【24h】

Examining the ethical and social issues of health technology design through the public appraisal of prospective scenarios: a study protocol describing a multimedia-based deliberative method

机译:通过对潜在情景的公共评估来研究卫生技术设计的伦理和社会问题:描述基于多媒体的协商方法的研究协议

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The design of health technologies relies on assumptions that affect how they will be implemented, such as intended use, complexity, impact on user autonomy, and appropriateness. Those who design and implement technologies make several ethical and social assumptions on behalf of users and society more broadly, but there are very few tools to examine prospectively whether such assumptions are warranted and how the public define and appraise the desirability of health innovations. This study protocol describes a three-year study that relies on a multimedia-based prospective method to support public deliberations that will enable a critical examination of the social and ethical issues of health technology design. Methods The first two steps of our mixed-method study were completed: relying on a literature review and the support of our multidisciplinary expert committee, we developed scenarios depicting social and technical changes that could unfold in three thematic areas within a 25-year timeframe; and for each thematic area, we created video clips to illustrate prospective technologies and short stories to describe their associated dilemmas. Using this multimedia material, we will: conduct four face-to-face deliberative workshops with members of the public (n?=?40) who will later join additional participants (n?=?25) through an asynchronous online forum; and analyze and integrate three data sources: observation, group deliberations, and a self-administered participant survey. Discussion This study protocol will be of interest to those who design and assess public involvement initiatives and to those who examine the implementation of health innovations. Our premise is that using user-friendly tools in a deliberative context that foster participants’ creativity and reflexivity in pondering potential technoscientific futures will enable our team to analyze a range of normative claims, including some that may prove problematic and others that may shed light over potentially more valuable design options. This research will help fill an important knowledge gap; intervening earlier in technological development could help reduce undesirable effects and inform the design and implementation of more appropriate innovations.
机译:背景技术卫生技术的设计依赖于影响其实现方式的假设,例如预期用途,复杂性,对用户自主权的影响以及适当性。设计和实施技术的人更广泛地代表用户和社会做出一些道德和社会假设,但是很少有工具可以前瞻性地检查这些假设是否必要以及公众如何定义和评估健康创新的必要性。本研究方案描述了一项为期三年的研究,该研究依靠基于多媒体的前瞻性方法来支持公众讨论,这将使您能够对卫生技术设计的社会和道德问题进行严格的审查。方法我们完成了混合方法研究的前两个步骤:依靠文献综述和我们多学科专家委员会的支持,我们开发了描述在25年内可以在三个主题领域内发生的社会和技术变化的情景;针对每个主题领域,我们创建了视频片段来说明预期的技术和简短的故事,以描述其相关的难题。使用这种多媒体材料,我们将:与公众(n = 40)进行四场面对面的讨论会,这些人随后将通过异步在线论坛加入其他参与者(n = 25)。分析和整合三个数据源:观察,小组讨论和自我管理的参与者调查。讨论该研究方案对那些设计和评估公众参与计划的人以及对卫生创新实施情况进行检查的人感兴趣。我们的前提是,在考虑性的背景下使用用户友好的工具来培养参与者的创造力和反思能力,以考虑潜在的技术科学未来,这将使我们的团队能够分析一系列规范性主张,包括一些可能会引起问题的规范性主张,以及另一些可能会引起争议的规范性主张。可能更有价值的设计方案。这项研究将有助于填补重要的知识空白;尽早介入技术开发可以帮助减少不良影响,并为更适当的创新设计和实施提供信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号