首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Dental Research >Comparative analysis of presence of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epsteinbarr virus -1 (EBV-1) in cases of chronic periodontitis and aggressive periodontitis with controls
【24h】

Comparative analysis of presence of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epsteinbarr virus -1 (EBV-1) in cases of chronic periodontitis and aggressive periodontitis with controls

机译:慢性牙周炎和侵袭性牙周炎与对照组相比,巨细胞病毒(CMV)和爱泼斯坦巴尔病毒-1(EBV-1)的存在比较分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Aim : The aim of the present study was to evaluate the presence of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epsteinbarr virus -1 (EBV-1)viruses in sub gingival plaque of chronic periodontitis (groupA), aggressive periodontitis patients (group B), periodontally healthy controls (group C) and to compare the clinical parameters between virus negative and positive sites in each of these groups. Materials and Methods : Sixty subjects were included in the study and equally divided into the 3 groups (group A - 20, group B - 20, group C - 20). Sub gingival plaque samples were obtained from the 3 deepest periodontal pocket sites in case of subjects suffering from periodontitis, and from one random bleeding site per quadrant in healthy groups. Clinical parameters like plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), pocket depth (PD) and clinical loss of attachment (CAL) were recorded. Viral Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was extracted using Proteinase-K DNA Extraction method, and the presence of CMV and EBV-1 was detected by polymerase chain reaction and 2% agarose gel. Results: Results of our study showed a 45% prevalence of CMV and EBV-1 in Aggressive periodontitis cases. Prevalence of CMV in chronic periodontitis and healthy subjects was 20% and 10%, respectively; while for EBV-1 it was 25% and 0%, respectively. In terms of comparison of the clinical parameters with virus presence, both CMV and EBV-1 positive sites showed a significantly higher mean pocket depth compared to virus negative sites. Conclusion: Our studyshowed that the prevalence of EBV1 was higher in chronic and aggressive periodontitis subjects compared to controls and the prevalence of CMV was higher in aggressive periodontitis patients. The virus positive sites showed higher pocket depth compared to virus negative sites.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是评估慢性牙周炎(A组),侵袭性牙周炎患者(B组),牙周健康的龈下斑块中是否存在巨细胞病毒(CMV)和爱泼斯坦巴尔病毒-1(EBV-1)病毒对照(C组),并比较这些组每组中病毒阴性和阳性位点之间的临床参数。材料和方法:60名受试者被纳入研究,并平均分为3组(A-20组,B-20组,C-20组)。如果患牙周炎,则从3个最深的牙周袋部位获得牙龈下菌斑样品,而在健康组中,从每个象限随机抽取一个出血部位。记录临床参数,如菌斑指数(PI),牙龈指数(GI),囊袋深度(PD)和临床附着丧失(CAL)。使用蛋白酶K DNA提取法提取病毒脱氧核糖核酸(DNA),并通过聚合酶链反应和2%琼脂糖凝胶检测CMV和EBV-1的存在。结果:我们的研究结果显示,侵略性牙周炎病例中CMV和EBV-1的患病率为45%。慢性牙周炎和健康受试者的CMV患病率分别为20%和10%。而EBV-1分别为25%和0%。根据临床参数与病毒存在的比较,与病毒阴性部位相比,CMV和EBV-1阳性部位均显示出明显更高的平均囊袋深度。结论:我们的研究表明,与对照组相比,慢性和侵袭性牙周炎患者的EBV1患病率更高,而侵袭性牙周炎患者的CMV患病率更高。与病毒阴性位点相比,病毒阳性位点显示出更高的口袋深度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号