首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Dental Research >Reliability of Logicon caries detector in the detection and depth assessment of dental caries: An in-vitro study
【24h】

Reliability of Logicon caries detector in the detection and depth assessment of dental caries: An in-vitro study

机译:Logicon龋齿检测器在龋齿检测和深度评估中的可靠性:一项体外研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: Digital radiography has so far not resulted in improved rates of proximal caries detection. Historically, automated caries detection tools have been largely academic. Opinions regarding the performance of the only such commercially available tool, viz., Logicon caries Detector (LCD) have been equivocal. This study was conducted to evaluate the reliability of LCD in the detection and depth assessment of proximal caries. Materials and Methods: Digital images were obtained of 100 proximal tooth surfaces using the Kodak RVG 5000 sensor and analyzed by three observers. The images were then analyzed by the principal investigator using the LCD software. The teeth were then sectioned and magnified photographic images were obtained which were taken as the gold standard. All the grades were entered in proformas and the data were statistically analyzed using the chi-square test. Five parameters of reliability were calculated. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy of LCD for the grade No caries were 33, 96, 73, 82, and 81%, respectively; for the grade Enamel caries were 5, 97, 33, 80, and 79%, respectively; and for the grade Dentin caries were 100, 96, 50, 100, and 96%, respectively. Conclusions: In conclusion, LCD appears to be more reliable in ruling out (both enamel and dentin) caries than in detecting caries.
机译:背景:迄今为止,数字射线照相术尚未提高近端龋齿的检出率。历史上,自动龋齿检测工具在很大程度上一直是学术性的。关于唯一的这种市售工具,即Logicon龋齿检测器(LCD)的性能的观点是模棱两可的。进行这项研究以评估LCD在近端龋齿检测和深度评估中的可靠性。材料和方法:使用Kodak RVG 5000传感器获得100个近牙表面的数字图像,并由三名观察者进行分析。然后由主要研究人员使用LCD软件对图像进行分析。然后将牙齿切成薄片,并获得放大的摄影图像作为金标准。所有等级均以形式输入,并使用卡方检验对数据进行统计分析。计算了五个可靠性参数。结果:无龋的LCD的敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值,阴性预测值和整体准确性分别为33%,96%,73%,82%和81%;搪瓷等级的龋齿分别为5%,97%,33%,80%和79%;牙本质龋的比例分别为100%,96%,50%,100%和96%。结论:总之,LCD在排除龋齿(牙釉质和牙本质)方面似乎比检测龋齿更可靠。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号