首页> 外文期刊>IIMB Management Review >A NEW INSIGHT INTO VALUE PREMIUM AND SIZE PREMIUM
【24h】

A NEW INSIGHT INTO VALUE PREMIUM AND SIZE PREMIUM

机译:对价值溢价和大小溢价的新认识

获取原文
       

摘要

In this paper, we show that in the Indiancontext, there is zero value premium(VP) among mid-market capitalisation(MC) portfolios and zero size premium(SP) among mid-price-to-book ratio(PB) portfolios. That is, in the mid-MCcategory, the low-PB stocks earn thesame return as high-PB stocks; similarly,among the mid-PB stocks, the ones withlow-MC earn the same return as thosewith high-MC. As we move away fromthe mid category, we observe significant VPs and SPs. More specifically,among low-MC stocks, there is positiveVP (that is, low-PB stocks earn morethan high-PB stocks), while in high-MCcategory, there is negative VP (low-PBstocks earn less than high-PB stocks). Inthe same way, among low-PB stocks,there is positive SP (low-MC stocks earnmore than high-MC stocks), while, in high-PB category, there is negative SP(low-MC stocks earn less than high-MCstocks). Fama and French (1993) havecome up with measures of VP and SP.Value, neutral, and growth stocksdenote, respectively, low-PB, mid-PB,and high-PB stocks. They measure VP byexcess return on value portfolio vis-avis growth portfolio. Similarly, smallcap, mid-cap, and big-cap stocksdenote, respectively, low-MC, mid-MC,and high-MC stocks. Size premium ismeasured by them by the excess returnof small-cap portfolio over big-capportfolio. Using Indian data from 1995to 2014, we find that though an overallVP or SP does not exist in India, VPexists for small-cap and big-cap portfolios, and SP for value and growth portfolios. Specifically, VP is significantlypositive in small-cap portfolios, weakly evident (though often close to zero) inmid-cap portfolios, and significantlynegative in big-cap portfolios. Similarly,SP is significantly positive in value portfolios, almost zero for neutral ones,and negative in growth portfolios.Thus, the mid-cap portfolio acts as azero-premium benchmark for VP, whilethe neutral portfolio acts as a zero-premium benchmark for SP. On either sideof the benchmark, there is a positive ornegative premium. We are not aware ofany work that finds the median (midcapor neutral) portfolio to be the zeropremium benchmark. We would like toiterate that our focus here is on themedian portfolios and not on analysingVP or SP per se in the Indian context.We suggest that our medial portfolioanalysis can be extended to other capital markets, including the USA.
机译:在本文中,我们表明,在印度语境下,中端市值(MC)投资组合中存在零价值溢价(VP),中价市盈率(PB)投资组合中存在零规模溢价(SP)。也就是说,在MC类别中部,低PB的股票获得与高PB的股票相同的回报;同样,在中型PB股票中,MC较低的股票的收益与MC较高的股票的收益相同。当我们离开中产阶级时,我们会观察到重要的VP和SP。更具体地说,在低MC的股票中,正VP(即低PB的股票收益高于高PB的股票),而在高MC类别中,负VP(低PB的股票收益低于高PB的股票) 。同样,在低市盈率股票中,SP为正(低中值股票收益高于高中值股票),而在高市盈率类别中则为负SP(低中值股票收益低于高中值股票收益) )。 Fama和French(1993)提出了VP和SP的度量。价值,中性和增长存量分别表示低PB,中PB和高PB库存。他们通过价值组合相对于航空组合的超额收益来衡量VP。同样,小盘股,中盘股和大盘股分别表示低MC,中MC和高MC股票。规模溢价是由小型股投资组合相对于大型投资组合的超额收益来衡量的。使用1995年至2014年的印度数据,我们发现尽管印度不存在总体VP或SP,但对于小型和大型股票投资组合存在VP,对于价值和增长投资组合则存在SP。具体而言,VP在小型股票投资组合中显着为正,在中型股票投资组合中表现不明显(尽管通常接近于零),而在大型股票投资组合中则显着为负。同样,SP在价值投资组合中显着为正,中性投资组合几乎为零,而在增长投资组合中为负。因此,中端投资组合充当VP的零保费基准,而中性投资组合充当SP的零保费基准。 。在基准的任一侧,都有正负溢价。我们不知道有任何工作将中值(中值中性)投资组合作为零溢价基准。我们要重申的是,我们的重点是印度主题资产组合,而不是印度背景下的VP或SP本身分析。我们建议,我们的中间资产组合分析可以扩展到包括美国在内的其他资本市场。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号