首页> 外文期刊>Avian Conservation and Ecology >Risk of Agricultural Practices and Habitat Change to Farmland Birds
【24h】

Risk of Agricultural Practices and Habitat Change to Farmland Birds

机译:农业实践的风险和农田鸟类栖息地的变化

获取原文
       

摘要

Many common bird species have declined as a result of agricultural intensification and this could be mitigated by organic farming. We paired sites for habitat and geographical location on organic and nonorganic farms in Ontario, Canada to test a priori predictions of effects on birds overall, 9 guilds and 22 species in relation to candidate models for farming practices (13 variables), local habitat features (12 variables), or habitat features that influence susceptibility to predation. We found that: (1) Overall bird abundance, but not richness, was significantly (p < 0.05) higher on organic sites (mean 43.1 individuals per site) than nonorganic sites (35.8 individuals per site). Significantly more species of birds were observed for five guilds, including primary grassland birds, on organic vs. nonorganic sites. No guild had higher richness or abundance on nonorganic farms; (2) Farming practice models were the best (ΔAIC < 4) for abundance of birds overall, primary grassland bird richness, sallier aerial insectivore richness and abundance, and abundance of ground nesters; (3) Habitat models were the best for overall richness, Neotropical migrant abundance, richness and abundance of Ontario-USA-Mexico (short-distance) migrants and resident richness; (4) Predation models were the best for richness of secondary grassland birds and ground feeders; (5) A combination of variables from the model types were best for richness or abundance overall, 13 of 18 guilds (richness and abundance) and 16 of 22 species analyzed. Five of 10 farming practice variables (including herbicide use, organic farm type) and 9 of 13 habitat variables (including hedgerow length, proportion of hay) were significant in best models. Risk modeling indicated that herbicide use could decrease primary grassland birds by one species (35% decline from 3.4 to 2.3 species) per site. Organic farming could benefit species of conservation concern by 49% (an increase from 7.6 to 11.4 grassland birds). An addition of 63 m of hedgerow could increase abundance and richness of short distance migrants by 50% (3.0 to 4.8 and 1.3 to 2.0, respectively). Increasing the proportion of hay on nonorganic farms to 50% could increase abundance of primary grassland bird by 40% (6.7 to 9.4). Our results provide support for alternative farmland designs and agricultural management systems that could enhance select bird species in farmland.
机译:由于农业集约化,许多普通鸟类种类减少了,有机耕作可以缓解这种情况。我们对加拿大安大略省有机和非有机农场的栖息地和地理位置进行了配对,以测试对总体耕作,9个行会和22种鸟类的影响的先验预测,这些预测与耕作方式的候选模型(13个变量),当地栖息地特征有关( 12个变量),或影响捕食敏感性的栖息地特征。我们发现:(1)有机站点(平均每个站点43.1个个体)上的总体鸟类丰度(而不是丰富度)显着(p <0.05)高于非有机站点(每个站点35.8个个体)。在有机和非有机地点,五个公会中观察到更多种类的鸟类,包括原始草原鸟类。公会在非有机农场中没有更高的丰富度或丰度。 (2)总体耕作丰度,草地一级鸟类的丰富度,空中食虫动物的丰富度和丰富度以及地面巢穴的丰富度,最佳的耕作模式(ΔAIC<4); (3)生境模型最适合整体富裕度,新热带移民的富裕度,安大略省-美国-墨西哥(短途)移民的富裕度和居民的富裕度; (4)捕食模型最适合次生草地鸟类和地面饲养者的丰富度; (5)模型类型的变量组合最适合总体上的丰富度或丰度,分析的18个行会中的13个(丰富度和丰度)和22个物种中的16个。在最佳模型中,10个耕作实践变量中的5个(包括除草剂的使用,有机农场的类型)和13个栖息地变量中的9个(包括树篱的长度,干草的比例)很重要。风险模型表明,使用除草剂可使每个地点的草原鸟类减少一种物种(从3.4种减少到2.3种减少35%)。有机耕作可使保护方面的物种受益(从7.6种增加到11.4种草地鸟类)。增加63 m的树篱可以使短距离移民的丰度和富裕度提高50%(分别为3.0至4.8和1.3至2.0)。将非有机农场的干草比例提高到50%可以使原生草原鸟类的丰度提高40%(6.7至9.4)。我们的结果为可替代农田设计和农业管理系统提供了支持,这些设计和农业管理系统可以增强农田中精选的鸟类种类。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号