首页> 外文期刊>Avian Conservation and Ecology >Estimated Mortality of Selected Migratory Bird Species from Mowing and Other Mechanical Operations in Canadian Agriculture
【24h】

Estimated Mortality of Selected Migratory Bird Species from Mowing and Other Mechanical Operations in Canadian Agriculture

机译:来自加拿大农业的割草和其他机械操作的候鸟迁徙物种的估计死亡率

获取原文
       

摘要

Mechanical operations such as mowing, tilling, seeding, and harvesting are well-known sources of direct avian mortality in agricultural fields. However, there are currently no mortality rate estimates available for any species group or larger jurisdiction. Even reviews of sources of mortality in birds have failed to address mechanical disturbance in farm fields. To overcome this information gap we provide estimates of total mortality rates by mechanical operations for five selected species across Canada. In our step-by-step modeling approach we (i) quantified the amount of various types of agricultural land in each Bird Conservation Region (BCR) in Canada, (ii) estimated population densities by region and agricultural habitat type for each selected species, (iii) estimated the average timing of mechanical agricultural activities, egg laying, and fledging, (iv) and used these values and additional demographical parameters to derive estimates of total mortality by species within each BCR. Based on our calculations the total annual estimated incidental take of young ranged from ~138,000 for Horned Lark (Eremophila alpestris) to as much as ~941,000 for Savannah Sparrow (Passerculus sandwichensis). Net losses to the fall flight of birds, i.e., those birds that would have fledged successfully in the absence of mechanical disturbance, were, for example ~321,000 for Bobolink (Dolichonyx oryzivorus) and ~483,000 for Savannah Sparrow. Although our estimates are subject to an unknown degree of uncertainty, this assessment is a very important first step because it provides a broad estimate of incidental take for a set of species that may be particularly vulnerable to mechanical operations and a starting point for future refinements of model parameters if and when they become available.
机译:诸如割草,耕作,播种和收获之类的机械操作是农业领域中直接禽类死亡的众所周知的来源。但是,目前没有任何物种组或更大管辖区的死亡率估算。甚至对鸟类死亡率的研究也未能解决农田的机械干扰。为了克服这一信息鸿沟,我们提供了通过机械操作对加拿大五个选定物种的总死亡率的估计。在逐步建模方法中,我们(i)量化了加拿大每个鸟类保护区(BCR)中各种类型的农业用地的数量,(ii)每种地区所选物种的估计人口密度,按地区和农业生境类型, (iii)估计机械农业活动,产卵和出雏的平均时间,(iv)并使用这些值和其他人口统计学参数得出每个BCR中按物种划分的总死亡率的估计值。根据我们的计算,每年估计的年幼小杂食动物数量从有角的云雀(Eremophila alpestris)的约138,000到大草原的麻雀(Passerculus sandwichensis)的约941,000。鸟类的秋季飞行的净损失,即那些在没有机械干扰的情况下本可以成功逃离的鸟类,例如,Bobolink(Dolichonyx oryzivorus)的损失约为321,000,而Savannah Sparrow的损失约为483,000。尽管我们的估算受到不确定程度的不确定性,但是此评估是非常重要的第一步,因为它提供了对可能特别易受机械操作影响的一组物种的附带估计的广泛估计,并且是将来进一步改良的起点。模型参数(如果有)以及何时可用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号