首页> 外文期刊>Azarian Journal of Agriculture >Row Spacing Determines Critical Period of Weed Control in Crop: Cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata ) as a Case Study
【24h】

Row Spacing Determines Critical Period of Weed Control in Crop: Cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata ) as a Case Study

机译:行距决定了作物杂草控制的关键时期:Cow豆(Vigna unguiculata)为例

获取原文
       

摘要

To further understand the importance of row spacing as an agronomic practice, a study was conducted to evaluate how levels of row spacing determines the critical period of weed control (CPWC) in cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata ). The experiment was laid out as a split-plot design with eight periods of weed interference as the main plots and three row spacing (60, 75 90 cm) as the subplots with three replications of each treatment combination. Period of weed interference consisted of weed removal for 14, 35, 54, and 77 days after emergence (DAE), and weed infestation for 14, 35, 54, and 77 DAE. Results indicated that the mean yield of cowpea was higher at narrow spacing (60 cm) than at wide spacing (90 cm) under season-long weed infestation plots but no difference in yield was found among the row spacing in the season-long weed removal plots. There was no difference in the beginning of the CPWC among the row spacing. However, 90 cm row spacing requires longer period of weed removal to avoid unacceptable yield loss when compared to 60 cm row spacing. The end of the CPWC coincides with the period of canopy closure by the crop. This finding suggests that it took the crop longer time to close canopy at wide row spacing (90 cm) compare to reduced row spacing. The differences in the duration of weed control intervention in crop row spacing suggest the importance of integrating decisions regarding row spacing and period of weed control in weed management strategies.
机译:为了进一步了解行距作为农学实践的重要性,进行了一项研究,以评估行距水平如何确定cow豆(Vigna unguiculata)杂草控制(CPWC)的关键时期。实验以分块图设计进行设计,其中八段杂草干扰为主要图,三行间距(60、75 90 cm)为子图,每种处理组合重复三次。杂草干扰期包括出苗后14、35、54和77天除草(DAE),以及14、35、54和77 DAE的杂草侵染。结果表明,在整个季杂草侵染区,narrow豆的平均产量在窄间距(60 cm)处比宽间距(90 cm)要高,但在整季杂草清除的行距之间,没有发现产量差异情节。行间距之间CPWC的开始没有差异。但是,与60厘米行距相比,90厘米行距需要更长的除草时间,以避免不可接受的产量损失。 CPWC的结束与农作物遮盖的时期相吻合。这一发现表明与较窄的行距相比,在较宽的行距(90厘米)处,关闭作物需要花费更长的时间。杂草控制行间杂草控制干预持续时间的差异表明,在杂草管理策略中整合有关行距和杂草控制周期的决策非常重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号