首页> 外文期刊>IDS Bulletin >Lessons from the Implementation of MDGs in Kenya: Options for a Post‐2015 Framework
【24h】

Lessons from the Implementation of MDGs in Kenya: Options for a Post‐2015 Framework

机译:肯尼亚实施千年发展目标的经验教训:2015年后框架的选择

获取原文
       

摘要

Kenya is playing a significant role in the development of post‐2015 MDG and SDG frameworks. This is compatible with the desire of the new leadership to be more proactive in the negotiation of international agreements. However, the synergies between various leadership roles remain under‐exploited, ultimately reducing Kenyan influence. In Kenya, the MDG period saw a fairly unsuccessful struggle to move away from the notion that the framework was an externally driven means to guide development assistance. While the present consultations around MDGs and SDGs might mean that governments will identify themselves more closely with the new framework, it does not mean that the framework will adequately reflect the views of the poor. Furthermore, there is a risk that a strong post‐2015 framework will dilute the imperative of human rights. The human rights framework offers the prospect of more transformative change, and there is a risk that it will be undermined if it does not form the core of the post‐2015 agreement.
机译:肯尼亚在2015年后千年发展目标和可持续发展目标框架的发展中发挥着重要作用。这符合新领导人希望在国际协议谈判中更加积极主动的愿望。但是,各种领导角色之间的协同作用仍未得到充分利用,最终降低了肯尼亚的影响力。在肯尼亚,千年发展目标时期在摆脱框架是指导发展援助的外部驱动手段这一观念上进行了相当失败的斗争。当前围绕千年发展目标和可持续发展目标的磋商可能意味着政府将与新框架更紧密地联系在一起,但这并不意味着该框架将充分反映穷人的观点。此外,有一个强大的2015年后框架有可能削弱人权的必要性。人权框架提供了更具变革性变革的前景,如果它不构成2015年后协议的核心,就有可能被破坏。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号