...
首页> 外文期刊>Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia >Quantitative comparison of different-shaped wavefront sensors and preliminary results for defocus aberrations on a mechanical eye
【24h】

Quantitative comparison of different-shaped wavefront sensors and preliminary results for defocus aberrations on a mechanical eye

机译:不同形状波前传感器的定量比较和机械眼散焦像差的初步结果

获取原文

摘要

PURPOSE: There is a general acceptance among the scientific community of Cartesian symmetry wavefront sensors (such as the Hartmann-Shack (HS) sensor) as a standard in the field of optics and vision science. In this study it is shown that sensors of different symmetries and/or configurations should also be tested and analyzed in order to quantify and compare their effectiveness when applied to visual optics. Three types of wave-aberration sensors were developed and tested here. Each sensor has a very different configuration and/or symmetry (dodecagonal (DOD), cylindrical (CYL) and conventional Hartmann-Shack (HS)). METHODS: All sensors were designed and developed in the Physics Department of the Universidade de S?o Paulo - S?o Carlos. Each sensor was mounted on a laboratory optical bench used in a previous study. A commercial mechanical eye was used as control. This mechanical eye has a rotating mechanism that allows the retinal plane to be positioned at different axial distances. Ten different defocus aberrations were generated: 5 cases of myopia from -1D to -5D and 5 cases of hyperopia, from +1D to +5D, in steps of 1D following the scale printed on the mechanical eye. For each wavefront sensor a specific image-processing and fitting algorithm was implemented. For all three cases, the wavefront information was fit using the first 36 VSIA standard Zernike polynomials. Results for the mechanical eye were also compared to the absolute Zernike surface generated from coefficients associated with the theoretical sphere-cylinder aberration value. RESULTS: Precision was analyzed using two different methods: first, a theoretical approach was used by generating synthetic Zernike coefficients from the known sphere-cylinder aberrations, simply by applying sphere-cylinder equations in the backward direction. Then comparisons were made of these coefficients with the ones obtained in practice. Results for DOD, HS and CYL sensors were, respectively, as follows: mean of root mean square (RMSE) for all aberrations, when theoretical Zernike coefficients were used as control, was 0.22, 0.66 and 0.26 microns; RMSE of sphere-cylinder values when compared to autorefractor measurements was 0.18D, 0.22D and 0.35D for sphere, 0.14D, 0.24D and 0.17D for cylinder, 34.36°, 35.16° and 26.36° for axis; RMSE of sphere-cylinder values when theoretical values were used as control was 0.11D, 0.29D and 0.46D for sphere, 0.15D, 0.28D and 0.17D for cylinder, 19.71°, 25.56° and 18.56° for axis. CONCLUSION: The main conclusion is that the symmetry of an optical sensor is not an important consideration when measuring typical eye aberrations such as defocus (myopic and hyperopic), but there are differences. In this sense, the polar symmetry sensors render results that are equivalent to the traditional Cartesian Hartmann-Shack sensor, but furnish an easier method for determining the optical center.
机译:目的:笛卡尔对称波前传感器(例如Hartmann-Shack(HS)传感器)在科学界已被光学和视觉科学领域的标准普遍接受。在这项研究中表明,还应测试和分析具有不同对称性和/或配置的传感器,以便量化和比较其应用于视觉光学系统时的有效性。在此开发并测试了三种类型的波像差传感器。每个传感器具有非常不同的配置和/或对称性(十二角形(DOD),圆柱形(CYL)和常规的Hartmann-Shack(HS))。方法:所有传感器均由圣保罗大学-卡洛斯大学物理系设计和开发。每个传感器都安装在先前研究中使用的实验室光学平台上。使用商业机械眼作为对照。该机械眼具有旋转机构,该旋转机构允许将视网膜平面定位在不同的轴向距离处。产生了十种不同的散焦像差:5例从-1D到-5D的近视和5例从+ 1D到+ 5D的远视,按照机械眼上打印的比例以1D的步长进行。对于每个波前传感器,都实现了特定的图像处理和拟合算法。对于这三种情况,波前信息均使用前36个VSIA标准Zernike多项式拟合。机械眼的结果也与绝对Zernike表面进行了比较,该绝对Zernike表面是从与理论球面像差相关的系数得出的。结果:使用两种不同的方法对精度进行了分析:首先,使用一种理论方法,即通过简单地向后应用球圆柱方程,从已知的球圆柱像差生成合成Zernike系数。然后将这些系数与实际获得的系数进行比较。 DOD,HS和CYL传感器的结果分别如下:当使用理论Zernike系数作为对照时,所有像差的均方根(RMSE)的均值为0.22、0.66和0.26微米;与自动折射仪测量相比,球面圆柱体值的RMSE分别为:球面0.18D,0.22D和0.35D,圆柱体0.14D,0.24D和0.17D,轴34.36°,35.16°和26.36°;当将理论值用作对照时,球柱体值的RMSE对于球体为0.11D,0.29D和0.46D,对于柱体为0.15D,0.28D和0.17D,对于轴为19.71°,25.56°和18.56°。结论:主要结论是,在测量诸如散焦(近视和远视)之类的典型眼像差时,光学传感器的对称性不是一个重要的考虑因素,但存在差异。从这个意义上讲,极对称传感器提供的结果与传统的笛卡尔Hartmann-Shack传感器相当,但提供了一种更容易确定光学中心的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号