首页> 外文期刊>ATBU Journal of Environmental Technology >Comparative Study of the Compressive Strength of Cement Laterite Brick Produced with Rice Husk Ash and Wood Ash as Partial Replacement Of Cement
【24h】

Comparative Study of the Compressive Strength of Cement Laterite Brick Produced with Rice Husk Ash and Wood Ash as Partial Replacement Of Cement

机译:用稻壳灰和木灰代替水泥生产的水泥红土砖抗压强度的比较研究

获取原文
       

摘要

The paper presents an outcome of experimental comparative study on the compressive strength of laterite brick made with rice husk ash and wood ash as partial replacement of cement. First, Rice Husk Ash (RHA) and Wood Ash (WA) were prepared and subjected to the following tests: specific gravity, density and bulk density. This was followed by the production of three types of bricks viz cement laterite-bricks(control), cement-laterite bricks produced using RHA as partial replacement of cement and another brick made with WA as partial replacement of cement. Replacement levels range from 0 - 30% at 10% intervals. The samples were cured by water sprinkling, before testing them for compressive strength at 7, 14, 21 and 28 curing days. Result of the tests showed that the specific gravity of RHA and WA are 2.20 and 2.13 respectively. The Absorption capacity of all the samples is in the range of 4.5 – 9.1%which is within the allowable value of 25% set by the Nigerian Industrial Standard. Compressive strength for 10 % replacements range from 0.75N/mm2 for 7days to 3.7N/mm2 for 28 days for RHA, as against 2.6 N/mm2 for 7days to 5.3N/mm2 for 28days curing for WA. This shows that bricks produced using WA are relatively higher in strength than those made with RHA. Though it is concluded that RHA and WA, can be used as partial replacements of cement in the production of laterite brick. Also, laterite brick produced with 20% and 30% partial replacements of cement with RHA and WA, respectively,, have, satisfied the minimum requirement as contained in BS 6073, and are recommendable. Keywords : Cement, compressive strength, rice husk ash, laterite brick, partial replacement levels, wood ash.
机译:本文介绍了用稻壳灰和木灰制成的水泥替代红土砖的抗压强度的实验比较研究结果。首先,制备稻壳灰(RHA)和木灰(WA)并进行以下测试:比重,密度和堆积密度。随后生产三种类型的砖,即水泥红土砖(对照),使用RHA代替水泥的部分生产的水泥红土砖和使用WA代替水泥的部分生产的另一种砖。替换级别范围为0-30%,间隔为10%。通过洒水将样品固化,然后在7、14、21和28固化天测试其抗压强度。试验结果表明,RHA和WA的比重分别为2.20和2.13。所有样品的吸收能力在4.5 – 9.1%的范围内,处于尼日利亚工业标准设定的25%的允许值之内。 10%替代品的抗压强度范围从0.75N / mm 2 7天到3.7N / mm 2 28天,而2.6 N / mm 2 7天至5.3N / mm 2 28天WA固化。这表明使用WA生产的砖的强度相对高于使用RHA生产的砖。尽管得出结论,RHA和WA可以用作红土砖生产中水泥的部分替代品。另外,用RHA和WA分别代替20%和30%的水泥部分生产的红土砖满足BS 6073中的最低要求,因此值得推荐。关键词:水泥,抗压强度,稻壳灰,红土砖,部分替代含量,木灰。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号