首页> 外文期刊>Annals of laboratory medicine. >Evaluation of BD MAX Staph SR Assay for Differentiating Between Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci and Determining Methicillin Resistance Directly From Positive Blood Cultures
【24h】

Evaluation of BD MAX Staph SR Assay for Differentiating Between Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci and Determining Methicillin Resistance Directly From Positive Blood Cultures

机译:BD MAX Staph SR测定法在金黄色葡萄球菌与凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌之间的鉴别以及直接从阳性血培养物测定对甲氧西林耐药性的评估

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: We evaluated the performance of the BD MAX StaphSR Assay (SR assay; BD, USA) for direct detection of Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin resistance not only in S. aureus but also in coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CNS) from positive blood cultures. Methods: From 228 blood culture bottles, 103 S. aureus [45 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), 55 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), 3 mixed infections (1 MRSA+Enterococcus faecalis, 1 MSSA+MRCNS, 1 MSSA+MSCNS)], and 125 CNS (102 MRCNS, 23 MSCNS) were identified by Vitek 2. For further analysis, we obtained the cycle threshold (Ct) values from the BD MAX system software to determine an appropriate cutoff value. For discrepancy analysis, conventional mecA/mecC PCR and oxacillin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined. Results: Compared to Vitek 2, the SR assay identified all 103 S. aureus isolates correctly but failed to detect methicillin resistance in three MRSA isolates. All 55 MSSA isolates were correctly identified by the SR assay. In the concordant cases, the highest Ct values for nuc, mecA, and mec right-extremity junction (MREJ) were 25.6, 22, and 22.2, respectively. Therefore, we selected Ct values from 0-27 as a range of positivity, and applying this cutoff, the sensitivity/specificity of the SR assay were 100%/100% for detecting S. aureus, and 97.9%/98.1% and 99.0%/95.8% for detecting methicillin resistance in S. aureus and CNS, respectively. Conclusions: We propose a Ct cutoff value for nuc/mec assay without considering MREJ because mixed cultures of MSSA and MRCNS were very rare (0.4%) in the positive blood cultures.
机译:背景:我们评估了BD MAX StaphSR分析(SR分析; BD,美国)用于直接检测金黄色葡萄球菌和甲氧西林耐药性的性能,不仅包括金黄色葡萄球菌,还包括来自阳性血液培养物的凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CNS)。方法:从228个血液培养瓶中提取103个金黄色葡萄球菌[45个耐甲氧西林的金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA),55个对甲氧西林敏感的金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA),3个混合感染(1个MRSA +粪肠球菌,1个MSSA + MRCNS, Vitek 2识别了125个CNS(102个MRCNS,23个MSCNS)。为进一步分析,我们从BD MAX系统软件获得了循环阈值(Ct),以确定适当的截止值。对于差异分析,确定了常规的mecA / mecC PCR和奥沙西林最小抑菌浓度(MIC)。结果:与Vitek 2相比,SR分析正确地鉴定了所有103株金黄色葡萄球菌,但未能检测出三种MRSA菌株对甲氧西林的耐药性。通过SR分析正确鉴定了所有55种MSSA分离物。在一致的情况下,nuc,mecA和mec右肢结(MREJ)的最高Ct值分别为25.6、22和22.2。因此,我们选择0-27之间的Ct值作为阳性范围,并应用该临界值,SR检测法对金黄色葡萄球菌的敏感性/特异性分别为100%/ 100%,97.9%/ 98.1%和99.0% /95.8%分别用于检测金黄色葡萄球菌和CNS中的甲氧西林耐药性。结论:我们提出了不考虑MREJ的nuc / mec分析的Ct临界值,因为在阳性血液培养中,MSSA和MRCNS的混合培养非常罕见(0.4%)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号