首页> 外文期刊>Asian spine journal. >Prevalence of High-Riding Vertebral Artery and Morphometry of C2 Pedicles Using a Novel Computed Tomography Reconstruction Technique
【24h】

Prevalence of High-Riding Vertebral Artery and Morphometry of C2 Pedicles Using a Novel Computed Tomography Reconstruction Technique

机译:使用新型计算机断层扫描重建技术的高骑行椎动脉和C2椎弓根的形态测量

获取原文
           

摘要

Study Design Cross-sectional, matched-pair comparative study. Purpose To determine whether a thin-sliced pedicular-oriented computed tomography (TPCT) scan reconstructed from an existing conventional computed tomography (CCT) scan is more accurate for identifying vertebral artery groove (VAG) anomalies than CCT. Overview of Literature Posterior atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation and C2 pedicle screws can cause vertebral artery (VA) injury. Two anatomic variations of VAG anomalies are associated with VA injury: a high-riding VA (HRVA) and a narrow pedicle of the C2 vertebra. CCT scan is a reliable method used to evaluate VAG anomalies; however, its accuracy level remains debatable. Literature comparing the prevalence of C2 VAG anomalies between CCT and TPCT is limited. Methods A total of 200 computed tomography scans of the upper cervical spine obtained between January 2008 and December 2011 were evaluated for C2 VAG anomalies (HRVA and narrow pedicular width) using CCT and TPCT. The prevalence of C2 VAG anomalies was compared using these two different measurement methods via a McNemar's test. Results Of the 200 patients studied, 23 HRVA (6.01%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.61%–8.39%) were detected with CCT, whereas 66 HRVA (16.54%; 95% CI, 12.85%–20.23%) were detected with TPCT ( p Conclusions VAG anomalies are commonly observed. A preoperative evaluation using TPCT reconstructed from an existing CCT revealed a significantly higher prevalence of C2 VAG anomalies than did CCT and showed comparable prevalence to previously published studies using more sophisticated and higher risk techniques. Therefore, we propose TPCT as an alternative preoperative evaluation for C2 screw placement and trajectory planning.
机译:研究设计横断面,配对配对比较研究。目的为了确定从现有的常规计算机断层扫描(CCT)扫描重建的薄层椎弓根方向计算机断层扫描(TPCT)扫描是否比CCT更准确地识别椎动脉沟(VAG)异常。文献概述后路寰枢椎经关节螺钉固定和C2椎弓根螺钉可能导致椎动脉(VA)损伤。 VAG异常的两种解剖学变化与VA损伤有关:高跨度VA(HRVA)和C2椎骨的椎弓根狭窄。 CCT扫描是用于评估VAG异常的可靠方法。但是,其准确性仍值得商.。比较CCT和TPCT之间C2 VAG异常患病率的文献有限。方法使用CCT和TPCT对2008年1月至2011年12月之间进行的200例上颈椎计算机X线断层扫描进行C2 VAG异常(HRVA和狭窄椎弓根宽度)的评估。使用这两种不同的测量方法,通过McNemar检验比较了C2 VAG异常的患病率。结果在200名患者中,CCT检测出23例HRVA(6.01%; 95%置信区间[CI],3.61%–8.39%),而66例HRVA(16.54%; 95%CI,12.85%–20.23%)被检出。用TPCT进行检测(p结论普遍观察到VAG异常。使用从现有CCT重建的TPCT进行术前评估显示,与CCT相比,C2 VAG异常的患病率明显更高,并且与使用较复杂和更高风险技术的先前发表的研究相比,其患病率相当。因此,我们建议将TPCT作为C2螺钉放置和轨迹规划的替代术前评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号