首页> 外文期刊>Annals of King Edward Medical University. >Evaluation of the Performance of Two Rapid Immunochromatographic Tests for Detection of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen and Anti HCV Antibodies Using Elisa Tested Samples
【24h】

Evaluation of the Performance of Two Rapid Immunochromatographic Tests for Detection of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen and Anti HCV Antibodies Using Elisa Tested Samples

机译:使用Elisa测试样品评估两种快速免疫色谱法检测乙型肝炎表面抗原和抗HCV抗体的性能

获取原文
           

摘要

Study Design: An experimental study conducted at the King Edward Medical University, Lahore during the period between November 2009 and January 2010. Four rapid immunochromatographic assays - ONE STEP HBsAg One Check, One step HBsAg test Accurate; Rapid anti HCV test One Check and Hepatitis C virus one step device Accurate were evaluated for detection of hepatitis B surface antigen and anti HCV. A collection of ELISA tested samples (57 tested for Hepatitis B by ELISA, 68 tested for Anti HCV antibodies by ELISA) were stored at -20°C and subsequently tested with rapid ICT tests (devices) (Accurate and One Check brands). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of these tests were calculated using ELISA as the gold standard. Aims: The study was aimed to evaluate the performance of two commercially available rapid immuno-chromatographic testing (ICT) kits for HBsAg and anti HCV antibodies. Materials and Methods: Elisa tested samples for HBV (n = 57) and HCV (n = 68) were allotted random numbers to the positive and negative specimens. The medical officers allotting the numbers and the one performing the tests were double blind. Results: Among the 38 ELISA HBV positive sera, 20 were positive by Hepatitis B surface antigen one check and 19 were positive by accurate. Among the 53 ELISA Anti HCV positive sera 24 were positive by one check, 32 were positive by accu-rate and 4 were weakly positive by accurate. The sensitivity for rapid Hepatitis B surface antigen was found to be 53% and 50 % for one check and accurate respectively. The sensitivity of rapid HCV devices was found to be 66% and 45% for Accurate and One Check kits respectively. The negative predictive value for rapid HBsAg devices was 51% and 49% for One Check and Accurate kits respectively. The positive predictive values for HCV were 96% and 97% with One Check and Accu-rate respectively; for HBV, these were 100% and 95% with Accurate and One Check respectively. Conclusion: These results suggest that the rapid immuno-chromatographic kits for HBsAg and HCV have only limited efficacy and should be backed by superior methods like ELISA and PCR where possible.
机译:研究设计:在2009年11月至2010年1月期间在拉合尔国王爱德华医科大学进行的一项实验研究。四种快速免疫色谱分析-一步HBsAg一次检查,一步HBsAg测试准确;快速的抗HCV检测一站式检查和丙型肝炎病毒一步检测仪Accurate被评估用于检测乙型肝炎表面抗原和抗HCV。一组ELISA测试样品(通过ELISA测试了57例针对乙型肝炎,通过ELISA测试了68种针对抗HCV抗体)存储在-20°C,然后通过快速ICT测试(设备)进行测试(Accurate和One Check品牌)。使用ELISA作为金标准,计算了这些测试的敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值,阴性预测值和诊断准确性。目的:该研究旨在评估两种市售的针对HBsAg和抗HCV抗体的快速免疫色谱测试(ICT)试剂盒的性能。材料和方法:将Elisa测试的HBV(n = 57)和HCV(n = 68)样品分配给阳性和阴性样品的随机数。分配数字的医务人员和进行测试的一名人员是双盲的。结果:在38份ELISA HBV阳性血清中,乙肝表面抗原1份检查阳性20份,准确检查19份阳性。在53份ELISA抗HCV阳性血清中,一项检查为24份阳性,准确的为32份阳性,准确的为4份弱阳性。一次检查对快速乙型肝炎表面抗原的敏感度为53%和50%,准确。对于Accurate和One Check套件,快速HCV设备的灵敏度分别为66%和45%。快速检查HBsAg设备的阴性预测值对于One Check和Accurate试剂盒分别为51%和49%。一次检查和准确率对HCV的阳性预测值分别为96%和97%; HBV的准确率和一次检查分别为100%和95%。结论:这些结果表明,用于HBsAg和HCV的快速免疫色谱试剂盒仅具有有限的功效,应在可能的情况下通过更好的方法如ELISA和PCR支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号