首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric Pollution Research >Comparisons of GM (1,1), and BPNN for predicting hourly particulate matter in Dali area of Taichung City, Taiwan
【24h】

Comparisons of GM (1,1), and BPNN for predicting hourly particulate matter in Dali area of Taichung City, Taiwan

机译:GM(1,1)和BPNN在台湾台中市大理地区预测小时颗粒物的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

This paper represents the first study to compare seven types of first–order and one–variable grey differential equation model [abbreviated as GM (1, 1)] and back-propagation artificial neural network (BPNN) for predicting hourly particulate matter (PM) including PMio and PM2.5 concentrations in Dali area of Taichung City, Taiwan. Their prediction performance was also compared. The results indicated that the minimum mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), mean squared error (MSE), and root mean squared error (RMSE) was 16.76%, 132.95, and 11.53, respectively for PM10 prediction. For PM2.5 prediction, the minimum MAPE, MSE, and RMSE value of 21.64%, 40.41, and 6.36, respectively could be achieved. All statistical values revealed that the predicting performance of GM (1, 1, x(0)), GM (1, 1, a), and GM (1, 1, b) outperformed other GM (1, 1) models. According to the results, it revealed that GM (1, 1) could predict the hourly PM variation precisely even comparing with BPNN.
机译:本文代表了一项比较七种类型的一阶和一变量灰色微分方程模型[缩写为GM(1,1)]和反向传播人工神经网络(BPNN)预测小时颗粒物(PM)的研究。包括台湾台中市大理地区的PMio和PM 2.5 浓度。他们的预测性能也进行了比较。结果表明,PM 10 预测的最小平均绝对百分误差(MAPE),均方误差(MSE)和均方根误差(RMSE)分别为16.76%,132.95和11.53。 。对于PM 2.5 预测,最小MAPE,MSE和RMSE值分别可以达到21.64%,40.41和6.36。所有统计值均表明GM(1、1, x (0)),GM(1、1, a )的预测性能和GM(1,1, b )胜过其他GM(1,1)模型。结果表明,与BPNN相比,GM(1,1)可以精确预测每小时的PM变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号