首页> 外文期刊>Asian journal of andrology >The therapeutic effect of pelvic floor muscle exercise on urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis
【24h】

The therapeutic effect of pelvic floor muscle exercise on urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis

机译:盆底肌肉运动对前列腺癌根治术后尿失禁的治疗作用:荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Pelvic floor muscle exercise (PFME) is the most common conservative management for urinary incontinence (UI) after radical prostatectomy (RP). However, whether the PFME guided by a therapist (G-PFME) can contribute to the recovery of urinary continence for patients after RP is still controversial. We performed this meta-analysis to investigate the effectiveness of G-PFME on UI after RP and to explore whether the additional preoperative G-PFME is superior to postoperative G-PFME alone. Literature search was conducted on Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and PubMed, to obtain all relevant randomized controlled trials published before March 1, 2018. Outcome data were pooled and analyzed with Review Manager 5.3 to compare the continence rates of G-PFME with control and to compare additional preoperative G-PFME with postoperative G-PFME. Twenty-two articles with 2647 patients were included. The continence rates of G-PFME were all superior to control at different follow-up time points, with the odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) of 2.79 (1.53–5.07), 2.80 (1.87–4.19), 2.93 (1.19–7.22), 4.11 (2.24–7.55), and 2.41 (1.33–4.36) at 1 month, 3 months, 4 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery, respectively. However, there was no difference between additional preoperative G-PFME and postoperative G-PFME, with the OR (95% CI) of 1.70 (0.56–5.11) and 1.35 (0.41–4.40) at 1 month and 3 months after RP, respectively. G-PFME could improve the recovery of urinary continence at both early and long-term stages. Starting the PFME preoperatively might not produce extra benefits for patients at early stage, compared with postoperative PFME.
机译:盆腔底肌运动(PFME)是根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后最常见的尿失禁(UI)保守治疗。然而,在治疗师的指导下,由治疗师(PFME)指导的PFME是否能有助于尿失禁的恢复尚存争议。我们进行了这项荟萃分析,以调查G-PFME对RP后UI的有效性,并探讨额外的术前G-PFME是否优于单独的术后G-PFME。在Cochrane图书馆,Embase,Web of Science和PubMed上进行文献检索,以获取2018年3月1日之前发布的所有相关随机对照试验。汇总结果数据,并使用Review Manager 5.3进行分析,以比较G-PFME的耐药率。有控制,并比较其他术前G-PFME与术后G-PFME。纳入22篇文章,收录2647例患者。在不同的随访时间点,G-PFME的失控率均优于对照,优势比(OR)(95%置信区间[CI])为2.79(1.53-5.07),2.80(1.87-4.19)分别在术后1个月,3个月,4个月,6个月和12个月时分别为2.93(1.19–7.22),4.11(2.24–7.55)和2.41(1.33–4.36)。然而,术前G-PFME与术后G-PFME之间没有差异,RP后1个月和3个月的OR(95%CI)分别为1.70(0.56-5.11)和1.35(0.41-4.40) 。 G-PFME可以改善早期和长期尿失禁的恢复。与术后PFME相比,术前开始PFME可能无法为早期患者带来额外的益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号