首页> 外文期刊>Annals. Computer Science Series >Comparison of Adaboost and Bagging Ensemble Method for Prediction of Heart Disease
【24h】

Comparison of Adaboost and Bagging Ensemble Method for Prediction of Heart Disease

机译:Adaboost和Bagging集成法在心脏病预测中的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

The medical industry arguably generates the largest amount of data on a daily basis. Extraction of new and useful information from the bulk of data generated is very tedious. Although, it contributes to the quality of service rendered in the health sector. Data mining techniques are among the major approach that shows promising result when applied in diagnosing patient and prediction of diseases. In this study, AdaBoost and Bagging are used to support classifiers such as Na?ve Bayes, Neural Network in prediction of heart disease while Random Forest was applied separately. Comparison of the experiment results focus majorly on the ensemble method used (AdaBoost and Bagging). With respect to this study, Bagging outperforms AdaBoost in term of Accuracy and other parameters such as Kappa Statistics, weighted average of ROC, Precision and MCC. It is therefore recommended as a good supportive technique for weak classifiers. Although, both Bagging and AdaBoost decline in performance when applied on rigorous dataset.
机译:可以说,医疗行业每天都会生成最多的数据。从生成的大量数据中提取新的有用信息非常繁琐。但是,它有助于提高卫生部门的服务质量。数据挖掘技术是在应用于患者诊断和疾病预测中显示出有希望的结果的主要方法之一。在这项研究中,AdaBoost和Bagging用于支持分类器(如朴素贝叶斯,神经网络)来预测心脏病,而随机森林则单独应用。实验结果的比较主要集中在所使用的合奏方法(AdaBoost和Bagging)上。对于这项研究,在准确度和其他参数(例如Kappa统计信息,ROC的加权平均值,精度和MCC)方面,装袋优于AdaBoost。因此,建议将其作为弱分类器的良好支持技术。但是,在严格的数据集上应用时,Bagging和AdaBoost的性能都会下降。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号