...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW. Land Reclamation >Evaluation of methods of comparative analysis of sums of atmospheric precipitation measured with the classical method and with a contact-less laser rain gauge
【24h】

Evaluation of methods of comparative analysis of sums of atmospheric precipitation measured with the classical method and with a contact-less laser rain gauge

机译:评价用经典方法和非接触式激光雨量计测量的大气降水总量的比较分析方法

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Evaluation of methods of comparative analysis of sums of atmospheric precipitation measured with the classical method and with a contact-less laser rain gauge. The paper concerns on the evaluation of a preliminary method of comparing data on diurnal sums of atmospheric precipitation acquired with the classic method and by means of Thies Clima laser precipitation monitor - disdrometer. The objective of the study was realized with the use of results of measurements of diurnal sum of precipitation conducted from 1 July to 31 August 2012, in the area of the Faculty Agro and Hydrometeorology Observatory of the Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences. Information about precipitation measured by means of disdrometer and processed by the authors’ software DisPre led to the development of three variants of precipitation totals counting (1 - data processed by means of the program supplied as standard by the manufacturer of the disdrometer, 2 - totals calculated from the volume of particular hydrometeors - 11 classes, and 3 - totals calculated basing on droplets’ diameters - 22 classes). The tests showed that the totals processed by the program supplied by the manufacturer proved to be the closest to the measurements taken with the Hellmann rain gauge as the method of precipitation calculation during a 24-hour period. The reason for the divergences of the observed values should be certainly sought in the method of measurement itself. Due to the high sensitivity of disdrometer on the external factors, it is absolutely necessary to conduct daily checks of cleanliness of the instrument - especially in the summer period.
机译:评价用经典方法和非接触式激光雨量计测量的大气降水总量的比较分析方法。本文涉及对比较经典方法和Thies Clima激光降水监测仪-测速仪获得的大气降水日总和数据的初步方法的评估。该研究的目的是通过使用2012年7月1日至8月31日在弗罗茨瓦夫环境与生命科学大学农学院和水文气象观测站进行的每日降水总量测量结果来实现的。关于通过测雨计测量并由作者的软件DisPre处理的降水的信息导致了三种降水总量计数方法的发展(1-数据由测风仪制造商提供的标准程序处理,2-总数根据特定的水凝物的体积计算得出-11类,而3-根据液滴直径计算的总数-22类)。测试表明,由制造商提供的程序处理的总量被证明与24小时内作为降水计算方法的Hellmann雨量计所进行的测量最接近。在测量方法本身中,当然应该寻找观测值差异的原因。由于测速仪对外部因素的敏感性很高,因此绝对有必要每天进行仪器清洁度检查,尤其是在夏季。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号