...
首页> 外文期刊>Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention >Dosimetric Validation of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy with Three 6MV Beam-Matched Linear Accelerators
【24h】

Dosimetric Validation of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy with Three 6MV Beam-Matched Linear Accelerators

机译:带有三个6MV束匹配直线加速器的体积调制电弧疗法的剂量学验证

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: To avoid inconvenience to patients due to linear accelerator down time in busy radio-therapy departments, treatment plans can be switched between linear accelerators provided that all exhibit the same same dosimetric characteristics. In other words linear accelerators should be beam-matched. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical significance of beam-matching using VMAT plans. Materials and Methods: Dosimetric data with a 6MV beam from am Clinac 2100CD were taken as baseline values and other two units, a 2300CD and a Unique Performance, were factory tuned in accordance. An analysis of PDD data was performed for different field sizes to evaluate energy matching. Beam profiles for field sizes of 10×10 cm2 and 40 × 40 cm2 at depths of 1.5 cm and 10 cm were analyzed. The relative output factor and MLC dosimetric properties were compared with each machine to determine variability among the different models. Thirty patients from our database were selected, ten each for head and neck, thorax and pelvis sites. VMAT plans were created in the Eclipse treatment planning system for a Clinac 2100 CD for reference. and verification plans were created for each to compare point dose measurements. Results: The TPR 20/10 for 10 × 10 cm2 was well matched, showing no energy differences. Deviation of all point dose measurements fell within ±3%. Planar dose maps all showed greater than 95% of points with a passed area γ-value less than 1. Conclusion: Our study evaluation of beam matching with treatment planning modeling showed good agreement fior 6 MV beams across all three linear accelerators used in our clinical environment.
机译:背景:为避免在繁忙的放射治疗部门因线性加速器停机而给患者带来不便,可以在线性加速器之间切换治疗计划,前提是它们均具有相同的剂量特性。换句话说,线性加速器应该是光束匹配的。目的:本研究的目的是评估使用VMAT计划进行光束匹配的临床意义。材料和方法:将来自am Clinac 2100CD的6MV光束的剂量学数据作为基线值,并根据工厂对其他两个单位(2300CD和Unique Performance)进行了调谐。对不同场大小的PDD数据进行了分析,以评估能量匹配。分析了在1.5 cm和10 cm深度处10×10 cm2和40×40 cm2场大小的光束轮廓。将相对输出因子和MLC剂量特性与每台机器进行比较,以确定不同模型之间的差异。从我们的数据库中选择了30名患者,头颈部,胸腔和骨盆部位各10名。在Eclipse治疗计划系统中为Clinac 2100 CD创建了VMAT计划,以供参考。并为每个创建验证计划以比较点剂量测量。结果:10×10 cm2的TPR 20/10匹配良好,没有能量差异。所有点剂量测量值的偏差均在±3%之内。平面剂量图均显示超过95%的点,且通过面积γ值小于1。结论:我们对光束与治疗计划建模的研究评估表明,在我们临床使用的所有三个线性加速器中,至少有6 MV光束具有良好的一致性环境。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号