首页> 外文期刊>Asian Journal of Urology >The men's health center: Disparities in gender specific health services among the top 50 “best hospitals” in America
【24h】

The men's health center: Disparities in gender specific health services among the top 50 “best hospitals” in America

机译:男性保健中心:美国前50名“最佳医院”中针对性别的保健服务存在差异

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective Gender-specific integrated health services have long existed in the arena of women's health care, but men's health centers (MHCs) have only recently emerged as a novel practice model. Here, we seek to evaluate the prevalence and format of MHCs found in the leading academic medical centers in the United States. Methods The US News & World Report's Top 50 Ranked Hospitals for Urology was used as our cohort. Data were gathered on the presence of MHCs and types of providers and conditions treated. An equivalent search was performed for women's health centers (WHCs). Results Sixteen of 50 (32%) promoted some type of MHC, compared to 49 of 50 (98%) offering a WHC. Eight of the top 15 ranked institutions (53%) had an MHC compared to eight of 35 (23%) remaining programs. Six of 16 MHCs incorporated providers from a variety of medical disciplines, including urologists, internists, endocrinologists, cardiologists, and psychologists, while another six of 16 MHCs were staffed solely by urologists. Eight of 16 provided services for exclusively urologic issues, four of 16 offered additional services in treatment of other medical conditions, and four of 16 did not specify. Conclusion A considerable disparity exists between the prevalence of gender-specific health services, with WHCs being much more numerous than MHCs. All but one leading institution had WHCs compared to less than one-third having MHCs. Our findings also highlight the heterogeneous nature of men's health programs, as they exhibit great variability in program type and focus, yet are all being marketed under the “Men's Health” banner.
机译:目标长期以来,妇女保健领域一直存在针对性别的综合保健服务,但直到最近,男子保健中心(MHC)才成为一种新颖的实践模式。在这里,我们试图评估在美国领先的学术医学中心中发现的MHC的患病率和形式。方法采用美国新闻与世界报道的泌尿外科排名前50位的医院。收集了有关MHC的存在以及提供者类型和所治疗条件的数据。对妇女保健中心(WHC)进行了同样的搜索。结果50名中的16名(32%)促进了某种类型的MHC,而50名中有49名(98%)提供了WHC。排名前15位的机构中有八个(53%)拥有MHC,而其余35个项目中有八个(23%)。 16个MHC中有6个合并了包括泌尿科医师,内科医师,内分泌学家,心脏病学家和心理学家在内的各种医学学科的提供者,而16个MHC中的另外6个仅由泌尿科医师组成。 16例中有8例专门针对泌尿科问题提供服务,16例中有4例提供了其他疾病治疗的附加服务,而16例中有4例未指定。结论不同性别的卫生服务的普及率之间存在相当大的差距,其中WHC比MHC多得多。除一家领先机构外,所有机构均拥有WHC,而拥有MHC的机构不到三分之一。我们的发现还凸显了男性健康计划的异质性,因为它们在计划类型和重点方面表现出很大的差异性,但都在“男性健康”的旗帜下进行销售。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号