...
首页> 外文期刊>Arthritis Research >Minorities with lupus nephritis and medications: a study of facilitators to medication decision-making
【24h】

Minorities with lupus nephritis and medications: a study of facilitators to medication decision-making

机译:患有狼疮性肾炎和药物治疗的少数族裔:促进药物治疗决策的研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Medication decision-making poses a challenge for a significant proportion of patients. This is an even more challenging for patients who have complex, rare, immune conditions that affect them at a young age and are associated with the use of life-long treatment, perceived by some as having significant risk of side effects and toxicity. Introduction The aim of our study was to examine the perspectives of women with lupus nephritis on facilitators to medication decision-making. Methods We used the nominal group technique (NGT), a structured formative process to elicit patient perspectives. An NGT expert moderated eight patient group meetings. Participants (n?=?52) responded to the question “What sorts of things make it easier for people to decide to take the medicines that doctors prescribe for treating their lupus kidney disease?” Patients nominated, discussed, and prioritized facilitators to medication decisional processes. Results Fifty-two women with lupus nephritis participated in eight NGT meetings (27 African-American, 13 Hispanic, and 12 Caucasian). Average age was 40.6?years (standard deviation (SD)?=?13.3), and disease duration was 11.8?years (SD?=?8.3); 36.5?% obtained at least a college education, and 55.8?% had difficulty in reading health materials. Patients generated 280 decision-making facilitators (range of 26 to 42 per panel). Of these, 102 (36?%) facilitators were perceived by patients as having relatively more influence in decision-making processes than others. Prioritized facilitators included effective patient-physician communication regarding benefits/harms, patient desire to live a normal life and improve quality of life, concern for their dependents, experiencing benefits and few/infrequento harms with lupus medications, and their affordability. Relative to African-Americans, Caucasian and Hispanic patients endorsed a smaller percentage of facilitators as influential. Level of agreement with which patients within panels independently agreed in their selections of the three most influential facilitators ranged from 33?% to 60?%. Conclusions We identified facilitators to lupus medication decision-making. This information will be used to populate a decision aid for lupus nephritis. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13075-015-0883-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:背景药物治疗决策对很大一部分患者构成了挑战。对于具有复杂,罕见,免疫状况的患者而言,这甚至更具挑战性,这些疾病会在年轻时影响他们,并伴有终身治疗的使用,有些人认为这种治疗具有巨大的副作用和毒性风险。引言我们研究的目的是研究狼疮性肾炎妇女对药物决策制定者的看法。方法我们使用名义组技术(NGT),这是一种结构化的形成过程,可以引起患者的观点。 NGT专家主持了八次患者小组会议。参与者(n?=?52)回答了“什么样的事情使人们更容易决定服用医生开出的治疗狼疮肾病的药物?”的问题。患者提名,讨论并优先考虑药物决定过程的促进者。结果52名狼疮性肾炎妇女参加了8次NGT会议(27名非裔美国人,13名西班牙裔和12名白人)。平均年龄为40.6岁(标准偏差(SD)=?13.3),疾病持续时间为11.8岁(SD?=?8.3)。 36.5%的人至少具有大学学历,而55.8%的人难以阅读健康资料。患者产生了280个决策促进者(每小组26至42个)。在这些患者中,有102位(36%)的促进者被患者认为在决策过程中的影响力要强于其他过程。优先协助者包括有效的医患沟通,包括利弊,患者过正常生活和改善生活质量的愿望,对家属的关注,受益以及狼疮药物很少/偶发/无害及其负担能力。相对于非裔美国人,高加索和西班牙裔患者认可的促进者比例较小。小组中患者在选择三个最具影响力的促进者时独立同意的同意水平为33%至60%。结论我们确定了促进狼疮用药决策的因素。该信息将用于填充狼疮肾炎的决策辅助。电子补充材料本文的在线版本(doi:10.1186 / s13075-015-0883-z)包含补充材料,授权用户可以使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号