首页> 外文期刊>Arts >‘We Cover New York’: Protest, Neighborhood, and Street Photography in the (Workers Film and) Photo League
【24h】

‘We Cover New York’: Protest, Neighborhood, and Street Photography in the (Workers Film and) Photo League

机译:“我们覆盖纽约” :(工人电影和)摄影同盟中的抗议,邻里和街头摄影

获取原文
           

摘要

This article considers photographs of New York by two American radical groups, the revolutionary Workers Film and Photo League (WFPL) (1931–1936) and the ensuing Photo League (PL) (1936–1951), a less explicitly political concern, in relation to the adjacent historiographical contexts of street photography and documentary. I contest a historiographical tendency to invoke street photography as a recuperative model from the political basis of the groups, because such accounts tend to reduce WFPL’s work to ideologically motivated propaganda and obscure continuities between the two leagues. Using extensive primary sources, in particular the PL’s magazine Photo Notes , I propose that greater commonalities exist than the literature suggests. I argue that WFPL photographs are a specific form of street photography that engages with urban protest, and accordingly I examine the formal attributes of photographs by its principle photographer Leo Seltzer. Conversely, the PL’s ‘document’ projects, which examined areas such as Chelsea, the Lower East Side, and Harlem in depth, involved collaboration with community organizations that resulted in a form of neighborhood protest. I conclude that a museological framing of ‘street photography’ as the work of an individual artist does not satisfactorily encompass the radicalism of the PL’s complex documents about city neighborhoods.
机译:本文考虑了两个美国激进组织纽约的照片,即革命性的工人电影和摄影同盟(WFPL)(1931-1936)和随后的摄影同盟(PL)(1936-1951),这在政治上不太明确邻近的街道摄影和纪录片的历史背景。我反对一种历史学上的趋势,即从团体的政治基础上将街头摄影作为一种疗养模式,因为这样的叙述往往会减少WFPL的工作,而这是出于意识形态的宣传,并且使两个联盟之间的连续性模糊不清。我建议使用广泛的主要资源,尤其是PL杂志的Photo Notes,我认为存在比文献所建议的更大的共性。我认为WFPL照片是一种与城市抗议活动有关的街头摄影的特殊形式,因此,我研究了其主要摄影师Leo Seltzer拍摄的照片的形式属性。相反,PL的“文件”项目对切尔西,下东区和哈林区等地区进行了深入研究,涉及与社区组织的合作,导致了邻里抗议。我得出的结论是,以“街头摄影”作为个人艺术家作品的博物馆学构架并不能令人满意地涵盖PL有关城市社区的复杂文献的激进主义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号