首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Silvicultural Research >How different management regimes of chestnut forests affect diversity and abundance of moth communities?
【24h】

How different management regimes of chestnut forests affect diversity and abundance of moth communities?

机译:板栗林的不同管理方式如何影响蛾类群落的多样性和丰度?

获取原文
           

摘要

Chestnut forests were exploited from centuries for several uses and are still nowadays managed under coppice and orchard regimes. The different management practices created a typical mosaic-like structure in landscapes in which alternate different kind of habitat represented by young and mature coppices, old thinned coppices with the physiognomy of high forest, and managed or abandoned orchards. The aim of our study was to evaluate how the different kind of management could affect the hosted biodiversity. We used nocturnal Lepidoptera as indicators, sampled in different woodlots along an altitudinal gradient in the chestnut forests of the Catena Costiera Mountains, southern Italy. We analyzed a published dataset concerning 15 stands subjected to different management regimes. We found that the main variables affecting moth communities distribution were (i) the elevation at which the stands were located and (ii) the time elapsed from the last human intervention. In fact, the stands subjected to recent intervention (young coppices and managed orchards) showed low values of moth richness and abundance, on the contrary the stands subjected to old interventions (mature and old coppices and abandoned orchards) registered a high number of species and individuals, mainly due to their greater structural complexity. Despite the quantitative differences, in woodlots recently managed were collected exclusive species that increased the diversity at a landscape level. Our results underlined the importance to maintain a mosaic-like landscape taking into account also the altitude when interventions are planned in order to improve the ecological sustainability of chestnut forest exploitation.
机译:几个世纪以来,人们一直在开发栗林,并将其用于多种用途,如今,它们仍在小灌木林和果园管理下进行管理。不同的管理实践在景观中创建了典型的马赛克状结构,在其中交替出现了不同类型的生境,分别是年轻和成熟的科比,具有稀疏森林的高稀疏的科比,以及管理或废弃的果园。我们研究的目的是评估不同类型的管理如何影响所承载的生物多样性。我们使用夜间鳞翅目作为指示剂,在意大利南部卡特纳科斯蒂拉山脉的板栗森林中沿海拔梯度在不同林地中取样。我们分析了涉及15个受不同管理制度影响的展位的已发布数据集。我们发现影响蛾类群落分布的主要变量是(i)展位所在的海拔高度和(ii)自上次人工干预以来经过的时间。实际上,受到最近干预的林分(幼林和果园)的蛾子丰富度和丰度低,相反,经过古老干预的林分(成熟和旧果园和废弃的果园)记录了很多物种。个人,主要是由于其结构复杂性更高。尽管数量上存在差异,但最近管理的林地中收集了一些独特的物种,这些物种增加了景观一级的多样性。我们的结果强调了在规划干预措施时要考虑到海拔高度,保持马赛克状景观的重要性,以提高板栗森林开发的生态可持续性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号