首页> 外文期刊>Arab Journal of Urology >[90] Self-created transobturator tape (TOT) vs standard industrially created TOT in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: Should we change the concept?
【24h】

[90] Self-created transobturator tape (TOT) vs standard industrially created TOT in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: Should we change the concept?

机译:[90]在压力性尿失禁的治疗中,自制的自闭带(TOT)与工业上制造的标准TOT相比:我们应该改变观念吗?

获取原文
       

摘要

ObjectiveTo compare the benefit and cost of tension-free self-created transobturator tape (SCTOT) with the standard industrially created TOT (ICTOT) in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI).MethodsA prospective study of the treatment of SUI with SCTOT (98 patients) and ICTOT (77 patients) was performed. Two types of industrially created slings were used: the ‘T sling’ (Herniamesh, Torino, Italy), and the ‘TVT obturator’ (Johnson & Johnson, Somerville, NJ, USA). SCTOT (15?×?1?cm) was created from a polypropylene rectangular 30?×?30?cm macroporous polypropylene monofilament mesh weighing 48?g/m2(Pelvimesh?, Herniamesh) and monofilament sutures. Sutures (polydioxanone [PDS] 2–0) were passed through both ends of the mesh stripe to make a ‘composite’ sling consisting of monofilament suture-sling-monofilament suture (Video). The Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6), the Incontinence Impact questionnaire (IIC-7) and the International Continence Impact questionnaire short form (ICIQ5-SF) were used to evaluate symptoms before and after surgery. The Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS >8) was used to identify patients with mixed UI (MUI).ResultsThe follow-up period was 12?months. There was no statistically significant difference (P?>?0.05) in objective cure between patients in the SCTOT group 84/98 (85.7%) and the ICTOT group 68/77 (88.3%). According to the IIC-7, UDI-6, ICIQ5-SF and OABSS symptom scores, significant improvement occurred in both groups, but it was better in the group with pure SUI than in the group with MUI, although it was not statistically significant. Symptom scores are shown in Tables 1 and 2. In all, 12 SCTOT were made from one polypropylene rectangular mesh priced at €60/piece. Compared to the price of the ICTOT (€400–700/piece) the SCTOT price is about 100-fold less.ConclusionThe results of the treatment with SCTOT are not inferior to the results of the treatment with ICTOT but are less expensive.
机译:目的比较无张力自创式自闭带(SCTOT)与标准工业用TOT(ICTOT)在治疗压力性尿失禁(SUI)中的收益和成本。方法前瞻性研究SCTOT治疗SUI(98例)和ICTOT(77例)。使用了两种类型的工业吊索:“ T吊索”(Herniamesh,意大利都灵)和“ TVT闭孔器”(Johnson&Johnson,萨默维尔,新泽西州,美国)。 SCTOT(15?×?1?cm)由重量为48?g / m2的聚丙烯矩形30?×?30?cm大孔聚丙烯单丝网(Pelvimesh?,Herniamesh)和单丝缝合线制成。缝线(聚二恶烷酮[PDS] 2-0)穿过网状条纹的两端,制成由单丝缝线-单丝单丝缝线组成的“复合”吊带(视频)。泌尿生殖器痛苦清单(UDI-6),失禁影响问卷(IIC-7)和国际失禁影响问卷简表(ICIQ5-SF)用于评估手术前后的症状。膀胱过度活动症症状评分(OABSS> 8)用于识别混合UI(MUI)患者。结果随访时间为12个月。 SCTOT组84/98(85.7%)与ICTOT组68/77(88.3%)之间的客观治愈率差异无统计学意义(P> 0.05)。根据IIC-7,UDI-6,ICIQ5-SF和OABSS症状评分,两组均发生了显着改善,但单纯SUI组比MUI组更好,尽管无统计学意义。症状评分如表1和表2所示。总共有12种SCTOT用一种聚丙烯矩形网眼制成,每片价格为60欧元。与ICTOT的价格(400-700欧元/个)相比,SCTOT的价格低100倍左右。结论SCTOT的治疗效果不亚于ICTOT的治疗效果,但价格便宜。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号