...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of public health >A qualitative assessment of business perspectives and tactics of tobacco and vape shop retailers in three communities in Orange County, CA, 2015–2016
【24h】

A qualitative assessment of business perspectives and tactics of tobacco and vape shop retailers in three communities in Orange County, CA, 2015–2016

机译:对加利福尼亚州奥兰治县三个社区的烟草和vape商店零售商的业务前景和策略进行定性评估,2015-2016年

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background In response to the growing awareness and use of electronic nicotine delivery systems?(ENDS), or e-cigarettes, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration asserted its regulatory authority over ENDS in May 2016. Federal, state, and local regulatory action on ENDS may have significant and unique impacts on specialty ENDS retailers, including tobacco and vape shops. The purpose of this study is to describe the commercial motivations of vape shops in minority communities as business entities whose financial interests and actions may be particularly impacted by regulation of ENDS. Methods Specialty tobacco and vape retail stores in three minority communities were identified through an online search and community canvassing. Key informant interviews were conducted with tobacco and vape shop owners or managers discussing the business interests and tactics of selling ENDS for their store. Interview data were coded and analyzed for major themes. Results Interviews with 18 tobacco shops and 9 vape shops were completed. Tobacco shops’ reasons for carrying e-cigarettes were business oriented, focused on maintaining their customer base. In comparison, vape shops opened because of the owner’s positive experiences with e-cigarettes and belief in the potential of e-cigarettes to help people quit or reduce smoking. Tobacco shops mainly see their customers as using e-cigarettes to quit smoking whereas vape shops reported their customers using e-cigarettes for more varied reasons. Tobacco shops are much more limited in their marketing than vape shops, which rely heavily on social media and experimentation with other forms of marketing. Conclusions Tobacco shops and vape shops differ in their rationale and approaches to the business of e-cigarettes. Vape shops engage in a wide range of activities that stabilize their financial interest and increase their influence with customers and within the vape community. In order for regulatory policymaking and tobacco control interventions to maximize effectiveness, the actions of vape shops in promoting ENDS use and influencing policy debates must be taken into account.
机译:背景技术为响应人们对电子尼古丁传送系统(ENDS)或电子烟的日益增长的认识和使用,美国食品药品管理局于2016年5月宣布对ENDS拥有监管权。联邦,州和地方对ENDS的监管行动可能会对专业ENDS零售商(包括烟草和vape商店)产生重大而独特的影响。这项研究的目的是描述少数族裔vape商店作为商业实体的商业动机,这些实体的财务利益和行为可能受到ENDS法规的特别影响。方法通过在线搜索和社区拉票,确定了三个少数民族社区的专业烟草和vape零售商店。与烟草和vape商店的所有者或经理进行了重要的信息提供者访谈,讨论了其商店销售ENDS的商业利益和策略。对访谈数据进行编码并分析主要主题。结果完成了对18家烟草店和9家vape商店的采访。烟草商店携带电子烟的原因是面向商业的,着重于维护其客户群。相比之下,开设vape商店的原因是店主在电子烟方面的积极经历以及对电子烟有助于人们戒烟或减少吸烟的潜力的信念。烟草店主要认为他们的顾客使用电子烟来戒烟,而vape商店报告他们的顾客使用电子烟的原因多种多样。烟草商店比vape商店在营销上受到更多限制,而vape商店主要依靠社交媒体和对其他形式的营销的尝试。结论烟草商店和vape商店在电子烟业务的原理和方法上有所不同。 Vape商店从事各种活动,以稳定其财务利益并增加其对客户和vape社区的影响力。为了使监管政策制定和烟草控制干预措施的有效性最大化,必须考虑vape商店在促进电子尼古丁传送系统使用和影响政策辩论方面的行动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号