首页> 外文期刊>Archives of disease in childhood >Behaviour and development in 24-month-old moderately preterm toddlers
【24h】

Behaviour and development in 24-month-old moderately preterm toddlers

机译:24个月大的中度早产儿的行为与发育

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective Moderately preterm children (gestational age 32–36+6?weeks) are at risk of cognitive and behaviour problems at school age. The aim of this study was to investigate if these problems are already present at the age of 2 years. Study design Developmental outcome was assessed at 24-months (corrected age) with the Bayley-III-NL in 116 moderately preterm (M=34.66±1.35?weeks gestation) and 99 term born children (M=39.45±0.98?weeks gestation). Behaviour problems were assessed with the Child Behaviour Checklist. Results With age corrected for prematurity, moderately preterm children scored below term peers on Receptive Communication skills (11.05±2.58 vs 12.02±2.74, p=0.02). Without correcting age for prematurity, moderately preterm children scored below term born peers on Cognition (8.97±2.11 vs 10.68±2.35, p0.001), Fine Motor (10.33±2.15 vs 11.96±2.15, p0.001), Gross Motor (8.47±2.55 vs 9.39±2.80, p=0.05), Receptive Communication (10.09±2.48 vs 12.02±2.74, p0.001) and Expressive Communication (10.33±2.43 vs 11.49±2.51, p=0.005) skills. Compared with term peers, more moderately preterm children showed a (mild) delay (ie, scaled score 7) in gross motor skills with age uncorrected for prematurity (20.7% vs 11.2%, p=0.04). Moderately preterm children had more internalising behaviour problems than term children (44.76±8.94 vs 41.54±8.56, p=0.03). No group differences were found in percentages of (sub)clinical scores. Conclusions At the age of 2 years, uncorrected for prematurity, differences in cognition, communication, and motor development were present in moderately preterm children compared with term born peers. After correcting age for prematurity, a difference was only found for receptive communication skills. In addition, moderately preterm children show more internalising behaviour problems.
机译:目的中度早产儿(胎龄32–36 + 6?周)在学龄期有认知和行为问题的风险。这项研究的目的是调查2岁时是否已经存在这些问题。研究设计用116例中度早产儿(M = 34.66±1.35?周)和99例足月儿(M = 39.45±0.98?周)的Bayley-III-NL评估24个月(校正后的年龄)的发育结局。 。使用儿童行为清单评估了行为问题。结果在校正早产年龄后,中度早产儿的接受沟通能力得分低于足月同龄人(11.05±2.58 vs 12.02±2.74,p = 0.02)。在不校正早产年龄的情况下,中度早产儿在认知方面得分低于足月同龄人(8.97±2.11 vs 10.68±2.35,p <0.001),精细运动(10.33±2.15 vs 11.96±2.15,p <0.001),大运动(8.47) ±2.55 vs.9.39±2.80,p = 0.05),接受交流(10.09±2.48 vs 12.02±2.74,p <0.001)和表现性交流(10.33±2.43 vs 11.49±2.51,p = 0.005)技能。与足月同龄人相比,更多中度早产儿的运动技能总水平有(轻微)延迟(即,得分<7),且未校正早产年龄(20.7%vs 11.2%,p = 0.04)。中度早产儿的内在行为问题比足月儿多(44.76±8.94比41.54±8.56,p = 0.03)。在(亚)临床分数的百分比中未发现组差异。结论与适龄出生的同龄人相比,中度早产儿在2岁时未进行早产校正,在认知,沟通和运动发育方面存在差异。校正早产年龄后,仅在接受性沟通技巧上发现差异。此外,中度早产儿表现出更多的内在行为问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号