首页> 外文期刊>Archives of disease in childhood >Systematic review of studies comparing combined treatment with paracetamol and ibuprofen, with either drug alone
【24h】

Systematic review of studies comparing combined treatment with paracetamol and ibuprofen, with either drug alone

机译:系统比较研究的结果,将扑热息痛和布洛芬与单独使用两种药物的联合治疗进行比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective To evaluate the evidence surrounding the use of combinations of paracetamol and ibuprofen in the treatment of fever. Design Systematic narrative review of randomised controlled trials using the UK Economic and Social Research Council guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis. Setting Inpatient, outpatient and home care. Patients Children with fever. Main outcome measures The effect of combination treatments of paracetamol and ibuprofen on fever and comfort, and identification of side effects. Results Seven studies were identified, six of which provided useful data for the evaluation of the effect of treatment on temperature. Overall these studies showed limited benefit from the combined treatment until around 4 h, after which there was a statistically but only marginally clinically significant benefit. Two studies contained data directly relating to comfort; these suggest a marginal benefit from the combined treatment, but the clinical significance of this was limited. There was no evidence of greater side effects or toxicities associated with the combined treatment. However, it is important to note that these studies were small, short term, and not conducted in the normal setting in which these treatments are given. Conclusions There is little evidence of any benefit or harm from the combined treatment compared with the use of each drug alone. In the absence of such benefit, there is little to recommend the unnecessary use of polypharmaceutical methods to treat a symptom that does not require treatment, when effective monotherapies exist.
机译:目的评估围绕扑热息痛和布洛芬联合使用治疗发烧的证据。使用英国经济与社会研究理事会关于叙事综合的指南,对随机对照试验进行系统的叙事设计。设置住院,门诊和家庭护理。患者儿童发烧。主要结果指标扑热息痛和布洛芬联合治疗对发烧和舒适度的影响,以及副作用的识别。结果确定了7项研究,其中6项为评估治疗对温度的影响提供了有用的数据。总体而言,这些研究显示联合治疗的获益有限,直到4 h左右,此后统计学上却有统计学意义,但在临床上仅有很小的获益。两项研究包含与舒适度直接相关的数据;这些提示联合治疗的益处很小,但是其临床意义是有限的。没有证据表明联合治疗具有更大的副作用或毒性。然而,重要的是要注意,这些研究是短期的,短期的,并且不是在给予这些治疗的正常情况下进行的。结论与单独使用每种药物相比,几乎没有证据表明联合治疗有任何利弊。在没有这种益处的情况下,很少有人建议在存在有效的单一疗法的情况下不必要地使用多药方法来治疗不需要治疗的症状。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号