首页> 外文期刊>Archives of clinical infectious diseases. >Synergistic or Antagonistic Effects of Probiotics and Antibiotics- Alone or in Combination- on Antimicrobial-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated from Burn Wounds
【24h】

Synergistic or Antagonistic Effects of Probiotics and Antibiotics- Alone or in Combination- on Antimicrobial-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated from Burn Wounds

机译:单独或组合使用益生菌和抗生素对从烧伤伤口分离的抗药性铜绿假单胞菌的协同或拮抗作用

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Bacterial burn infections are one of the serious infections and since their treatment with antibiotics is very difficult, infection control in such wounds is very important. Therefore, methods should be sought to enhance the effects of antibiotics and also reduce the resistance to them. It seems that probiotics have antimicrobial features and are effective in wound healing. Objectives: The current study aimed at evaluating and comparing the antimicrobial effects of antibiotics and probiotics, as well as their combination on bacterial burn infections. Methods: Thirty clinically resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa species isolated from hospitalized patients with burn wounds were collected. Antibacterial activity of five antibiotics and 11 probiotic strains, and also their combination were evaluated by disk diffusion method. One-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test were used for data analysis. Results: It was found that the effect of inhibitory zone in combination use of tetracycline + a probiotic strain was more than using the antibiotic and probiotic alone. Also, the current study found that among the probiotics, Lactobacillus plantarum 299v had the highest effect, although not significant, on resistant P. aeruginosa . The current study explained that the inhibitory effect of L. plantarum 299v was significantly higher than that of ciprofloxacin (P = 0.009). In addition, antibacterial activity of gentamicin + L. salivarius (ES1) was significantly higher compared with that of gentamicin + L. routeri (P = 0.01). Conclusions: The current study explained that probiotics had a useful potential inhibitory effect on the growth of the pathogens. The study showed that in most cases, inhibitory zones of probiotics were greater than those of antibiotics as well as combination of antibiotic + probiotic. But, there was an exception in tetracycline, which had synergistic effect with probiotics. Conversely, in the cases of imipenem and chloramphenicol, addition of probiotics had antagonistic effects. Further studies are needed to describe different results. Therefore, it seems that the type of antibiotics and probiotics are important to create the synergistic or antagonistic effects.
机译:背景:细菌烧伤感染是严重的感染之一,由于用抗生素治疗非常困难,因此控制此类伤口的感染非常重要。因此,应寻求方法来增强抗生素的作用并降低其耐药性。益生菌似乎具有抗菌功能,可以有效地治愈伤口。目的:当前的研究旨在评估和比较抗生素和益生菌及其组合对细菌烧伤感染的抗菌作用。方法:从住院烧伤创面患者中分离出三十种临床耐药的铜绿假单胞菌。通过圆盘扩散法评估了5种抗生素和11种益生菌菌株的抗菌活性及其组合。单向方差分析和Tukey事后检验用于数据分析。结果:发现与单独使用抗生素和益生菌相比,四环素+益生菌菌株联合使用对抑制区的作用更大。另外,当前的研究发现,在益生菌中,植物乳杆菌299v对耐药性铜绿假单胞菌具有最高的作用,尽管不显着。当前的研究解释说,植物乳杆菌299v的抑制作用明显高于环丙沙星(P = 0.009)。此外,庆大霉素+唾液乳杆菌(ES1)的抗菌活性明显高于庆大霉素+ router肉乳杆菌(P = 0.01)。结论:目前的研究解释说,益生菌对病原体的生长具有潜在的潜在抑制作用。研究表明,在大多数情况下,益生菌的抑制区大于抗生素以及抗生素+益生菌的结合区。但是,四环素有一个例外,它与益生菌具有协同作用。相反,在亚胺培南和氯霉素的情况下,添加益生菌具有拮抗作用。需要进一步的研究来描述不同的结果。因此,似乎抗生素和益生菌的类型对于产生协同或拮抗作用很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号