首页> 外文期刊>Aquatic Invasions >Risk classifications of aquatic non-native species: Application of contemporary European assessment protocols in different biogeographical settings
【24h】

Risk classifications of aquatic non-native species: Application of contemporary European assessment protocols in different biogeographical settings

机译:水生非本地物种的风险分类:当代欧洲评估协议在不同生物地理环境中的应用

获取原文
           

摘要

Non-native species can cause negative impacts when they become invasive. This study entails a comparison of risk classifications for 25 aquatic non-native species using various European risk identification protocols. For 72% of the species assessed, risk classifications were dissimilar between countries. The pair-wise comparison of Freshwater Fish Invasiveness Scoring Kit (FISK) scores of in total 28 fish species from the UK, Flanders (Belgium) and Belarus resulted in a higher correlation for scores of Flanders-Belarus than that of Flanders-UK and Belarus-UK. We conclude that different risk classifications may occur due to differences in (1) national assessment protocols, (2) species-environment matches in various biogeographical regions, and (3) data availability and expert judgement. European standardisation of risk assessment protocols, performance of biogeographical region specific risk classifications and further research on key factors for invasiveness of aquatic ecosystems are recommended.
机译:非本地物种在侵入时会造成负面影响。这项研究需要使用各种欧洲风险识别方案对25种水生非本地物种的风险分类进行比较。对于评估的72%物种,国家之间的风险分类是不同的。对来自英国,法兰德斯(比利时)和白俄罗斯的总共28种鱼类的淡水鱼入侵评分工具包(FISK)得分的成对比较得出,法兰德斯-白俄罗斯的得分与法兰德斯-英国和白俄罗斯的得分相关性更高。 -英国我们得出结论,由于(1)国家评估规程,(2)不同生物地理区域中物种与环境的匹配以及(3)数据可用性和专家判断的不同,可能会发生不同的风险分类。建议进行欧洲风险评估协议的标准化,生物地理区域特定风险分类的性能以及对水生生态系统入侵性关键因素的进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号