...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied Network Science >Community-based time segmentation from network snapshots
【24h】

Community-based time segmentation from network snapshots

机译:网络快照中基于社区的时间分段

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract Community detection has proved to be extremely successful in a variety of domains. However, most of the algorithms used in practice assume networks are unchanging in time. This assumption is violated for many datasets, resulting in incorrect or misleading communities. Many different algorithms to rectify this problem have been proposed. Most of them, however, focus on community evolution rather than abrupt changes. The problem of change detection is easier than that of community evolution, and is often sufficient. Here, we propose an algorithm for determining community-based change points from network snapshots. Networks can then be aggregated between change points, and analyzed without violating assumptions. There are three network types that we have defined our algorithm for, each having a case study: static nodesets, semi-static nodesets, and dynamic nodesets. The case studies for these network types are: the Ukrainian Legislature, the Enron email network, and Twitter data from Ukraine. We empirically verify our algorithm in each case study, and compare results to two popular alternatives: Generalized Louvain and GraphScope. We show the impracticality of Generalized Louvain and that our method is less sensitive than GraphScope. Lastly, we use our first two case studies to determine optimal parameters for an anomaly-detection-based streaming method. We then demonstrate that the streaming method was capable of determining events both from data collection errors and from internal network disruptions.
机译:摘要事实证明,社区检测在各个领域都非常成功。但是,实践中使用的大多数算法都假设网络时间不变。许多数据集都违反了这一假设,从而导致社区不正确或产生误导。已经提出了许多不同的算法来纠正此问题。但是,它们中的大多数都专注于社区发展,而不是突然的变化。变化检测的问题比社区进化的问题更容易,并且通常就足够了。在这里,我们提出了一种用于从网络快照确定基于社区的更改点的算法。然后可以在变更点之间聚合网络,并在不违反假设的情况下进行分析。我们为算法定义了三种网络类型,每种类型都有一个案例研究:静态节点集,半静态节点集和动态节点集。这些网络类型的案例研究包括:乌克兰立法机关,安然电子邮件网络和来自乌克兰的Twitter数据。我们在每个案例研究中都通过经验验证了我们的算法,并将结果与​​两种流行的替代方法进行比较:广义Louvain和GraphScope。我们证明了广义Louvain的不切实际性,并且我们的方法不如GraphScope敏感。最后,我们使用前两个案例研究来确定基于异常检测的流方法的最佳参数。然后,我们证明了流传输方法能够根据数据收集错误和内部网络中断确定事件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号