首页> 外文期刊>Annual Research & Review in Biology >Comparison of Regeneration between Human Bone Marrow and Adipose Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Treatment of Critical Size Bone Defect in Sprague Dawley Rats
【24h】

Comparison of Regeneration between Human Bone Marrow and Adipose Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Treatment of Critical Size Bone Defect in Sprague Dawley Rats

机译:人骨髓和脂肪间充质干细胞再生处理Sprague Dawley大鼠临界大小骨缺损的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Aims: This study was to investigate the difference of osteogenic capacity between BMSC and ASC by quantifying the expression of Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP)-2 and BMP receptor (BMPR) II also the bone healing process by histomorphometry measurement. Study Design: This study was experimental study on animal (Sprague Dawley Rat). Place and Duration of Study: This study took place in Animal Laboratory of Indonesian Health Minister, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Stem Cell Unit, and Department of Anatomical Pathology Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, and also Primate Study Center of Bogor Institute of Agriculture. Methodology: Eighteen Sprague dawley (SD) healthy rats were induced with 5 mm femoral bone defect, then divided into three equal groups (n=6) consist of Control, Implementation of 2x106 BMSC + 5 cc Hydroxypatite (HA), and Implementation of 2x106 ASC + 5cc HA. They were sacrificed after 2 weeks, then underwent histomorphometry assessment with Image-J. The measured paramater were total area of callus, % of osseous area, % of cartilage area, and % of fibrous area. The immunohistochemistry (IHC) measurement was assessed by staining intensity and immunoreactivity score (IRS). Results: The BMSC group showed higher expression of BMPR II compare to others. The expression of BMPR II was analyzed statistically and showed significant result ( P = .04) among groups with median 4.00 ± 2.75. Both BMSC and ASC group have significantly better bone healing process compared with control group ( P = .001). There are no significant differences between ASC and BMSC measured in % total callus area ( P = 1.00), %Osseous area ( P = 1.00), %Cartilage area ( P = .49) and %Fibrous area ( P = .18). Conclusion: ASC bone healing ability are similar to BMSC. BMP-2 and BMPR II are important but not sole contributing factor for bone healing.
机译:目的:本研究旨在通过组织形态计量学方法量化骨形态发生蛋白(BMP)-2和BMP受体(BMPR)II的表达以及骨骼愈合过程,从而研究BMSC与ASC之间成骨能力的差异。研究设计:该研究是对动物(Sprague Dawley Rat)的实验研究。研究的地点和持续时间:这项研究是在印度尼西亚卫生部长动物实验室,印度尼西亚大学医学院,骨伤科,干细胞科和解剖病理学系Cipto Mangunkusumo医院以及茂物灵长类动物研究中心进行的农业研究所。方法:将18只Sprague dawley(SD)健康大鼠诱发5 mm股骨缺损,然后将其分为对照组,实施2x10 6 BMSC + 5 cc羟基磷灰石的3组,每组3只(HA),以及2x10 6 ASC + 5cc HA的实现。 2周后将其处死,然后用Image-J进行组织形态计量学评估。测得的参数是愈伤组织的总面积,骨面积的百分比,软骨面积的百分比和纤维面积的百分比。通过染色强度和免疫反应评分(IRS)评估免疫组化(IHC)测量。结果:BMSC组与其他组相比,BMPR II表达更高。对BMPR II的表达进行统计学分析,结果显示,中位数为4.00±2.75,各组之间的结果均显着(P = .04)。与对照组相比,BMSC和ASC组的骨愈合过程均明显更好(P = .001)。 ASC和BMSC之间的总愈伤面积百分比(P = 1.00),骨面积百分比(P = 1.00),软骨面积百分比(P = .49)和纤维面积百分比(P = .18)均无显着差异。结论:ASC的骨愈合能力与BMSC相似。 BMP-2和BMPR II是重要的,但不是骨愈合的唯一因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号