首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Environmental Sciences >Controlling Ammonia Volatilization by Mixing Urea with Humic Acid, Fulvic Acid, Triple Superphosphate and Muriate of Potash | Science Publications
【24h】

Controlling Ammonia Volatilization by Mixing Urea with Humic Acid, Fulvic Acid, Triple Superphosphate and Muriate of Potash | Science Publications

机译:通过将尿素与腐殖酸,富勒酸,三重过磷酸钙和钾肥混合来控制氨挥发科学出版物

获取原文
           

摘要

> Problem statement: Inefficient use of inorganic fertilizer such as urea is caused by substantial losses of ammonia when urea is surface-applied. Ammonia losses can be controlled by adding acidic material such as TSP, HA or FA. In order to reduce ammonia loss and retain soil exchangeable ammonium and available nitrate as well as producing complete organic based fertilizer, this study was conducted to compare the effects of urea-TSP-MOP, urea-TSP-MOP-HA, urea-TSP-MOP-FA, urea-TSP-MOP-acidified (HA + FA) mixtures on ammonia loss, soil pH, soil exchangeable ammonium and available nitrate accumulation compared to urea alone. Approach: The effects of urea amended with or without TSP, MOP, HA and FA were evaluated in a laboratory condition using a closed-dynamic air flow system. Ammonia loss, soil pH, soil exchangeable ammonium and available nitrate were determined using standard procedures. Results: Urea-TSP-MOP-HA, Urea-TSP-MOP, Urea-TSP-MOP-FA and Urea-TSP-MOP-Acidified (HA + FA) mixtures significantly reduces ammonia loss by 12.92, 20.12, 29.54 up to 100 % compared to urea alone. The same observation was made for soil exchangeable ammonium. From all the treatments, only Urea-TSP-MOP-FA and Urea-TSP-MOP-Acidified (HA + FA) significantly retained soil available nitrate accumulation and the findings were consistent with pH found in the study. It must be stressed that results obtained in the incubation experiment using an acidic (pHwater 6.32) soil of Typic Paleudults (Bekenu series) might only be applicable to similar acid soils. Conclusion: Urea, TSP and MOP amended with HA or HA and FA significantly reduced ammonia loss. The outcome of this study may contribute to the improvement of urea N, P and K use efficiency as well as reducing environmental pollution.
机译: > 问题陈述:尿素等无机肥料的无效使用是由于尿素表面施用时氨的大量损失而引起的。氨气损失可通过添加酸性物质(例如TSP,HA或FA)来控制。为了减少氨气损失并保留土壤可交换的铵态氮和有效硝酸盐以及生产完全有机基肥料,本研究旨在比较尿素-TSP-MOP,尿素-TSP-MOP-HA,尿素-TSP-与单独的尿素相比,MOP-FA,尿素-TSP-MOP酸化的(HA + FA)混合物在氨气损失,土壤pH值,土壤可交换铵盐和可用硝酸盐积累方面具有优势。 方法:在实验室条件下,使用封闭动态气流系统评估了尿素在有或没有TSP,MOP,HA和FA的情况下的效果。使用标准程序测定氨气损失,土壤pH,土壤可交换铵和有效硝酸盐。 结果:尿素-TSP-MOP-HA,尿素-TSP-MOP,尿素-TSP-MOP-FA和尿素-TSP-MOP-酸化(HA + FA)的混合物可将氨损失显着降低12.92 ,20.12、29.54最多比单独使用尿素高100%。对于土壤可交换铵进行了相同的观察。在所有处理中,只有Urea-TSP-MOP-FA和Urea-TSP-MOP-Acidified(HA + FA)显着保留了土壤中可利用的硝酸盐累积量,其结果与研究中的pH值一致。必须强调的是,在使用Typic Paleudults(Bekenu系列)的酸性(pH 6.32)土壤进行温育实验中获得的结果可能仅适用于相似的酸性土壤。 结论:用HA或HA和FA修正尿素,TSP和MOP可以显着减少氨气损失。这项研究的结果可能有助于提高尿素氮,磷和钾的利用率,并减少环境污染。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号