首页> 外文期刊>Analytical methods >Fluorescent microRNA biosensors: a comparison of signal generation to quenching
【24h】

Fluorescent microRNA biosensors: a comparison of signal generation to quenching

机译:荧光microRNA生物传感器:信号产生与猝灭的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Many microRNA biosensor platforms use fluorescence signal generation or quenching; however, signal generation is often regarded as the superior method. An argument can be made that if the noise is the same for both methods, then there should be no difference between the two methods. Current literature details the analytical figures of merit (FOM) for transduction and recognition mechanisms that use either signal generation or quenching, but lacks a direct comparison using the same fluorescent reporter molecule. Here we provide such a direct comparison. The signal-on and signal-off fluorescence metrics were found to be comparable rather than competitive. We found fluorescence enhancement provides marginal improvements to sensitivity and limits of detection (LOD) over fluorescence quenching. In fact, both transduction mechanisms are capable of picomolar LOD. The role thermodynamics plays on the sensitivity and LOD are discussed. Both signal-on and signal-off gave statistically similar signal-to-noise ratios. Finally, the selectivity of the two recognition mechanisms for miRNA detection will be addressed. In the future, we will use this knowledge to advance highly sensitive and selective in situ microRNA sensors for cell and tissue imaging.
机译:许多microRNA生物传感器平台都使用荧光信号产生或淬灭。但是,信号生成通常被认为是一种更好的方法。可以说,如果两种方法的噪声相同,则两种方法之间应该没有差异。当前文献详细描述了使用信号产生或猝灭的转导和识别机制的分析品质因数(FOM),但缺乏使用同一荧光报告分子的直接比较。在这里,我们提供了这样的直接比较。发现信号开启和信号关闭荧光指标具有可比性而不是竞争性。我们发现,荧光增强与荧光淬灭相比,灵敏度和检测限(LOD)略有提高。实际上,两种转导机制都具有皮摩尔的LOD能力。讨论了热力学在灵敏度和LOD上的作用。信号开启和信号关闭的统计信噪比均相似。最后,将讨论用于miRNA检测的两种识别机制的选择性。将来,我们将利用这些知识来发展用于细胞和组织成像的高灵敏度和选择性原位microRNA传感器。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号