首页> 外文期刊>Analytical methods >On the validation by inter-laboratory study of ‘procedures’ in chemical measurement
【24h】

On the validation by inter-laboratory study of ‘procedures’ in chemical measurement

机译:通过实验室间研究对化学测量“程序”进行验证

获取原文
           

摘要

This study examines formally the proposition that validation of analytical procedures can be best undertaken by interlaboratory study. It approaches the task by considering the fundamental nature of validation and the meaning of a€?procedurea€? in relation to uncertainty. The contention is that (a) only procedures as such can be validated, (b) the results of a procedure are empirical, (c) empirical procedures are unbiased, and (d) the interlaboratory reproducibility standard deviation (SDR) associated with an unbiased procedure is an unbiased estimate of the uncertainty. The definitive interlaboratory study for estimating SDR is the collaborative trial, but the case is made that, with due caution, data from proficiency tests can also provide useful estimates of SDR and thence estimates of uncertainty.
机译:这项研究正式检验了通过实验室间研究可以最好地进行分析程序验证的主张。它通过考虑验证的基本性质和“过程教育”的含义来处理任务。关于不确定性。争论在于(a)只有这样的程序才能得到验证;(b)程序的结果是经验性的;(c)经验性程序是无偏的;以及(d)与无偏见相关的实验室间可重复性标准偏差(SDR)程序是不确定性的无偏估计。用于估计SDR的权威性实验室间研究是协作试验,但有理由证明,在适当谨慎的情况下,能力验证数据也可以提供有用的SDR估计值以及不确定性的估计值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号