...
首页> 外文期刊>Animals >Impact of Feed Delivery Pattern on Aerial Particulate Matter and Behavior of Feedlot Cattle ?
【24h】

Impact of Feed Delivery Pattern on Aerial Particulate Matter and Behavior of Feedlot Cattle ?

机译:饲喂方式对气粒特性和饲养场牛行为的影响?

获取原文

摘要

Fine particulate matter with less than 2.5 microns diameter (PM 2.5 ) generated by cattle in feedlots is an environmental pollutant and a potential human and animal health issue. The objective of this study was to determine if a feeding schedule affects cattle behaviors that promote PM 2.5 in a commercial feedlot. The study used 2813 crossbred steers housed in 14 adjacent pens at a large-scale commercial West Texas feedlot. Treatments were conventional feeding at 0700, 1000, and 1200 (CON) or feeding at 0700, 1000, and 1830 (ALT), the latter feeding time coincided with dusk. A mobile behavior lab was used to quantify behaviors of steers that were associated with generation of PM 2.5 (e.g., fighting, mounting of peers, and increased locomotion). PM 2.5 samplers measured respirable particles with a mass median diameter ≤2.5 μm (PM 2.5 ) every 15 min over a period of 7 d in April and May. Simultaneously, the ambient temperature, humidity, wind speed and direction, precipitation, air pressure, and solar radiation were measured with a weather station. Elevated downwind PM 2.5 concentrations were measured at dusk, when cattle that were fed according to the ALT vs. the CON feeding schedule, demonstrated less PM 2.5 -generating behaviors ( p < 0.05). At dusk, steers on ALT vs. CON feeding schedules ate or were waiting to eat (standing in second row behind feeding cattle) at much greater rates ( p < 0.05). Upwind PM 2.5 concentrations were similar between the treatments. Downwind PM 2.5 concentrations averaged over 24 h were lower from ALT compared with CON pens (0.072 vs. 0.115 mg/m 3 , p < 0.01). However, dry matter intake (DMI) was less ( p < 0.05), and average daily gain (ADG) tended to be less ( p < 0.1) in cattle that were fed according to the ALT vs. the CON feeding schedules, whereas feed efficiency (aka gain to feed, G:F) was not affected. Although ALT feeding may pose a challenge in feed delivery and labor scheduling, cattle exhibited fewer PM 2.5 -generating behaviors and reduced generation of PM 2.5 when feed delivery times matched the natural desires of cattle to eat in a crepuscular pattern.
机译:饲养场中的牛产生的直径小于2.5微米(PM 2.5)的细颗粒物是环境污染物,并且可能是人类和动物健康的问题。这项研究的目的是确定饲喂时间表是否会影响在商业饲养场中促进PM 2.5的牛的行为。该研究使用了2813头杂交ste牛,它们被安置在西德州大型商业饲养场的14个相邻围栏中。处理方法为常规喂养0700、1000和1200(CON)或0700、1000和1830(ALT),后者的喂养时间与黄昏相吻合。移动行为实验室用于量化与PM 2.5生成相关的操舵行为(例如,打架,同伴坐骑和运动增加)。 PM 2.5采样器在4月和5月的7天内每15分钟测量一次质量中值直径≤2.5μm(PM 2.5)的可吸入颗粒。同时,用气象站测量环境温度,湿度,风速和风向,降水,气压和太阳辐射。在黄昏时测量了顺风时PM 2.5的浓度升高,当时按照ALT与CON饲喂方案喂养的牛表现出较少的PM 2.5产生行为(p <0.05)。黄昏时,按ALT与CON喂食时间表进行的ers牛以更高的比率进食或等待进食(排在喂牛的第二排)(p <0.05)。处理之间的上风PM 2.5浓度相似。与CON笔相比,ALT在整个24小时内的平均PM 2.5浓度要低(0.072对0.115 mg / m 3,p <0.01)。但是,根据ALT与CON饲喂时间表饲喂的牛的干物质摄入量(DMI)较少(p <0.05),平均日增重(ADG)倾向于较低(p <0.1),而饲料效率(又称饲料获得,G:F)不受影响。尽管ALT饲喂可能会给饲料输送和人工安排带来挑战,但是当饲料输送时间与牛的自然需求成缝隙状时,牛表现出较少的PM 2.5生成行为并减少了PM 2.5生成。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号