首页> 外文期刊>Animals >Parameters for the Analysis of Social Bonds in Horses
【24h】

Parameters for the Analysis of Social Bonds in Horses

机译:马的社会纽带分析参数

获取原文
           

摘要

Social bond analysis is of major importance for the evaluation of social relationships in group housed horses. However, in equine behaviour literature, studies on social bond analysis are inconsistent. Mutual grooming (horses standing side by side and gently nipping, nuzzling, or rubbing each other), affiliative approaches (horses approaching each other and staying within one body length), and measurements of spatial proximity (horses standing with body contact or within two horse-lengths) are commonly used. In the present study, we assessed which of the three parameters is most suitable for social bond analysis in horses, and whether social bonds are affected by individual and group factors. We observed social behaviour and spatial proximity in 145 feral horses, five groups of Przewalski’s horses ( N = 36), and six groups of feral horses ( N = 109) for 15 h per group, on three days within one week. We found grooming, friendly approaches, and spatial proximity to be robust parameters, as their correlation was affected only by the animals’ sex (GLMM: N = 145, SE = 0.001, t = ?2.7, p = 0.008) and the group size (GLMM: N = 145, SE 0.001, t = 4.255, p 0.001), but not by the horse breed, the aggression ratio, the social rank, the group, the group composition, and the individuals themselves. Our results show a trend for a correspondence between all three parameters (GLMM: N = 145, SE = 0.004, t = 1.95, p = 0.053), a strong correspondence between mutual grooming and friendly approaches (GLMM: N = 145, SE = 0.021, t = 3.922, p 0.001), and a weak correspondence between mutual grooming and spatial proximity (GLMM: N = 145, SE = 0.04, t = 1.15, p = 0.25). We therefore suggest either using a combination of the proactive behaviour counts mutual grooming and friendly approaches, or using measurements of close spatial proximity, for the analysis of social bonds in horses within a limited time frame.
机译:社会纽带分析对于评估群居马的社会关系至关重要。然而,在马的行为文献中,关于社会纽带分析的研究并不一致。相互修饰(两匹马并排站立,并轻轻地夹住,鼻翼或互相摩擦),附属方法(两匹马互相接近并保持在一个身体长度内)以及空间接近度的测量(与马身体接触或在两匹马内站立的马)长度)。在本研究中,我们评估了三个参数中的哪一个最适合马的社会纽带分析,以及社会纽带是否受个人和群体因素的影响。我们在一周内的三天内观察了145只野马,五组普氏原羚(N = 36)和六组野马(N = 109)的社交行为和空间接近度,每组持续15 h。我们发现修饰,友善方法和空间接近度是可靠的参数,因为它们的相关性仅受动物性别(GLMM:N = 145,SE = 0.001,t =?2.7,p = 0.008)和组大小的影响(GLMM:N = 145,SE <0.001,t = 4.255,p <0.001),但不是由马的品种,侵略率,社会地位,群体,群体组成和个人本身决定的。我们的结果显示了所有三个参数之间的对应关系的趋势(GLMM:N = 145,SE = 0.004,t = 1.95,p = 0.053),相互修饰和友好方法之间的强烈对应关系(GLMM:N = 145,SE = 0.021,t = 3.922,p <0.001),以及相互修饰和空间接近度之间的弱对应关系(GLMM:N = 145,SE = 0.04,t = 1.15,p = 0.25)。因此,我们建议使用前摄行为计数的组合相互修饰和友好的方法,或者使用紧密的空间接近度的测量值来分析有限时间内马的社会纽带。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号