首页> 外文期刊>Annales Geophysicae >Comparison of Birkeland current observations during two magnetic cloud events with MHD simulations
【24h】

Comparison of Birkeland current observations during two magnetic cloud events with MHD simulations

机译:用MHD模拟比较两次磁性云事件期间的伯克兰电流观测

获取原文
           

摘要

Low altitude field-aligned current densities obtained from globalmagnetospheric simulations are compared with two-dimensionaldistributions of Birkeland currents at the topside ionospherederived from magnetic field observations by the constellation ofIridium satellites. We present the analysis of two magnetic cloudevents, 17–19 August 2003 and 19–21 March 2001, where theinterplanetary magnetic field (IMF) rotates slowly(~10°/h) to avoid time-aliasing in the magneticperturbations used to calculate the Birkeland currents. In theAugust 2003 event the IMF rotates from southward to northward whilemaintaining a negative IMF By during much of theinterval. During the March 2001 event the IMF direction varies fromdawnward to southward to duskward. We find that the distributions ofthe Birkeland current densities in the simulations agreequalitatively with the observations for northward IMF. For southwardIMF, the dayside Region-1 currents are reproduced in the simulation,but appear on average 5° further poleward of their observedlocation, while the nightside Region-1 currents and the Region-2currents are largely under-represented. Comparison of the observedand simulated Birkeland current distributions, which are intimatelyrelated to the plasma drifts at the ionosphere, shows that theionospheric convection pattern in the MHD model and its dependenceon the IMF orientation is essentially correct. The Birkeland totalcurrents in the simulations are about a factor of 2 larger thanobserved during southward IMF. For Bz
机译:从全球磁层模拟获得的低高度场对准的电流密度与铱星星座的磁场观测得出的顶电离层的伯克兰电流的二维分布进行了比较。我们对2003年8月17日至19日和2001年3月19日至21日的两个磁性云事件进行了分析,其中行星际磁场(IMF)缓慢旋转(〜10°/ h),以避免在计算伯克兰地的磁扰动中出现时间混淆潮流。在2003年8月的事件中,IMF从南向北旋转,同时在大部分时间间隔内保持负IMF B y 。在2001年3月的事件中,IMF的方向从黎明到南部再到黄昏有所变化。我们发现,模拟中伯克兰电流密度的分布与北向IMF的观测值在质量上吻合。对于南向IMF,模拟中复制了白天的Region-1电流,但平均出现在其观测位置的极角5°处,而夜间的Region-1电流和Region-2电流则远远不足。比较观察到的和模拟的Birkeland电流分布,这与电离层的等离子体漂移密切相关,表明MHD模型中的电离层对流模式及其对IMF方向的依赖性基本上是正确的。模拟中的Birkeland总电流比向南的IMF观测到的大2倍。对于 B z 0,总电流中的差异减小,并且模拟结果完全向北的IMF与观测值相吻合在10%之内。观测之间的伯克兰电流幅值与模拟结果之间的差异是模拟高估了电离层电场和铱拟合低估了磁扰动的综合作用。在模拟和观测中,电离层网格的纬度分辨率的边际差异显示出对伯克兰电流的大小仅具有次要影响。 IMF南部周期模拟中的电势是通过DMSP测量等离子漂移速度所获得的电势的两倍,这表明模拟中的重新连接速率太大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号