首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesia and pain medicine. >Park, Kim, and In: Comparison of the endotracheal tube intracuff pressure with cylindrical and tapered cuffs during nitrous oxide exposure: a randomized single-blinded clinical study
【24h】

Park, Kim, and In: Comparison of the endotracheal tube intracuff pressure with cylindrical and tapered cuffs during nitrous oxide exposure: a randomized single-blinded clinical study

机译:Park,Kim和In:一氧化二氮暴露期间气管插管的袖带压与圆柱形和锥形袖带的比较:一项随机单盲临床研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Tracheal complications caused by excessive mucosal pressure from an inflated endotracheal tube are major concerns during anesthesia; hence, an intracuff pressure of 20–30 cmH2O is recommended as a clinically acceptable intracuff pressure. Diffusion of nitrous oxide (N2O) into the endotracheal tube cuff increases the intracuff pressure, which may also be influenced by the cuff shape. Therefore, we investigated whether the intracuff pressure of a tapered cuff was different from that of a cylindrical cuff in patients undergoing general anesthesia using 60% N2O. Methods: Twenty-six patients who underwent general anesthesia using 60% N2O in supine position were randomly allocated to the cylindrical cuff group (Group C) or tapered cuff group (Group T). The baseline intracuff pressure was set at 20 cmH2O, and measured every 10 minutes for 60 minutes. Results: The primary outcome was the intracuff pressure at 60 minutes after N2O exposure, which was 40 cmH2O in Group C (95% CI 36–44) and 40 cmH2O (95% CI 35–45) in Group T (P = 0.895). The lower confidence limit of the intracuff pressures in both groups exceeded 30 cmH2O at 60 minutes of N2O exposure, which is the upper limit for clinically acceptable intracuff pressure (20–30 cmH2O). Conclusions: There was no significant difference in the intracuff pressures between cylindrical and tapered cuffs. Continuous or frequent monitoring is recommended regardless of the duration of the 60% N2O exposure because the intracuff pressure can exceed 30 cmH2O within an hour.
机译:背景:由气管内导管充盈引起的粘膜压力过高引起的气管并发症是麻醉期间的主要问题。因此,推荐的袖套内压为20–30 cmH2O,作为临床上可接受的袖套内压。一氧化二氮(N2O)扩散到气管导管内袖带中会增加袖带内压力,这也可能受到袖带形状的影响。因此,我们调查了在使用60%N2O进行全身麻醉的患者中,锥形袖带与圆筒形袖带的袖带内压力是否不同。方法:将26例仰卧位使用60%N2O进行全身麻醉的患者随机分为圆柱袖带组(C组)或锥形袖带组(T组)。袖带基线压力设置为20 cmH2O,每10分钟测量60分钟。结果:主要结果是N2O暴露后60分钟的袖带内压力,C组(95%CI 36-44)为40 cmH2O,T组为40 cmH2O(95%CI 35-45)(P = 0.895) 。两组患者在N2O暴露60分钟时,袖带内压力的置信下限超过30 cmH2O,这是临床上可接受的袖带内压力的上限(20-30 cmH2O)。结论:圆柱形和锥形袖带之间的袖带内压力无显着差异。无论连续60%的N2O暴露持续时间如何,建议进行连续或频繁监测,因为袖带内压力在一小时内可能超过30 cmH2O。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号