首页> 外文期刊>Animals >Social Licking in Pregnant Dairy Heifers
【24h】

Social Licking in Pregnant Dairy Heifers

机译:怀孕的奶牛小母牛的社交舔

获取原文
           

摘要

Simple Summary Social licking is often associated with good animal welfare, but little is known about this behavior in cattle. Licking behavior was compared in heifers housed indoors versus on pasture. Licking frequency was four-fold higher when heifers were indoors. However, when considering all social interactions recorded (licking and aggressions) licking events represented about 10% of all interactions regardless of housing. This behavior happened more frequently between heifers that were observed more repeatedly in close vicinity of each other. Provision of smaller indoor floor spaces likely brought animals into closer proximity thus facilitating social interactions. Abstract Housing affects social behaviors, such as competition, but little work has addressed affiliative behaviors. This study compared social licking (SL) in pregnant heifers housed indoors (in a free-stall barn) versus outdoors (on pasture), and relationships with competition, feeding and physical proximity to others. Six heifer groups were observed during two six-hour-periods in both treatments. The total number of social events (SL and agonistic interactions) was four times higher when heifers were housed indoors compared to pasture (546 ± 43 vs. 128 ± 7 events/group; P 0.05). SL as a ratio of the total number of social events was similar in the two treatments (12% vs. 8% of interactions, free-stall and pasture, respectively; P 0.05). Housing did not affect how the SL bout was initiated and terminated, the duration, the body part licked and behavior preceding licking (P 0.05). Animals in close proximity showed higher rates of SL (P 0.0001) but not agonistic interactions (P 0.05). A previous agonistic event did not predict occurrence or the role of heifers in the following licking event. The higher stocking density indoors likely resulted in increased social interactions.
机译:简单总结社交舔通常与良好的动物福利有关,但对牛的这种行为知之甚少。在室内和牧场上比较了小母牛的舔behavior行为。小母牛在室内时,舔水频率要高四倍。但是,考虑到记录的所有社交互动(舔和侵略),无论居住情况如何,舔事件约占所有互动的10%。这种现象在小母牛之间发生的频率更高,而在彼此相距较近的母牛中,重复出现的次数更多。提供较小的室内地板空间可能会使动物靠近,从而促进社交互动。摘要住房影响社会行为,例如竞争,但很少有工作涉及亲属行为。这项研究比较了室内(在无棚畜舍中)与室外(在牧场上)怀孕的小母牛的社交舔食(SL)以及与竞争,喂养和与他人的身体亲近关系。在两种处理的两个六个小时期间内观察到六个小母牛组。当将小母牛放在室内时,社交事件的总数(SL和激动作用)比牧场高出四倍(546±43 vs. 128±7事件/组; P <0.05)。两种治疗方法中,SL占社交事件总数的比例相似(分别为12%和8%,分别为自由档和牧场; P> 0.05)。住房没有影响SL回合的启动和终止方式,持续时间,舔舔身体部位以及舔舔前的行为(P> 0.05)。紧邻的动物表现出较高的SL发生率(P <0.0001),但没有激动性相互作用(P> 0.05)。先前的激动事件无法预测小母牛在随后的舔舔事件中的发生或作用。室内较高的放养密度可能导致社交互动增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号