首页> 外文期刊>Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia >Free flaps in Surgical Dermatology: comparison between fasciocutaneous and myocutaneous free flaps in facial reconstructions
【24h】

Free flaps in Surgical Dermatology: comparison between fasciocutaneous and myocutaneous free flaps in facial reconstructions

机译:外科皮肤科的游离皮瓣:面部重建中筋膜皮肤和肌皮游离皮瓣的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Dermatologic surgeons routinely harvest pedicled flaps at distance with an axial or random pattern to repair facial defects. These types of skin flaps are time-consuming and have high economic, social and personal costs. These drawbacks could be avoided with the introduction of a single-step transfer of free flaps to the recipient site, with microvascular anastomosis. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that better results are obtained with myocutaneous or fasciocutaneous free flaps and which one is more suitable in surgical dermatology. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We selected two patients of opposite sexes and similar ages who had undergone Mohs surgery to remove recurrent malignant tumors that were located in the upper cheek bordering the zygomatic zone. The woman was treated with a fasciocutaneous radial free flap and the man with a rectus abdominis free flap. RESULTS: Both patients had excellent immediate postoperative outcomes. Complications observed in the male patient were related to a previous pulmonary alteration. The fasciocutaneous radial free flap reconstruction was easier to perform than the rectus abdominis free flap; nevertheless, the radial free flap is very thin and, although the palmaris longus tendon is used, it does not yield enough volume, requiring later use of implants. In contrast, the rectus abdominis free flap transfers a wide flap with enough fat tissue to expand in the future. As for the cosmetic results regarding the donor site, the rectus abdominis free flap produces better-looking scars, since secondary defects of the palmar surface cannot be directly closed and usually require grafting - a situation that some patients do not accept. CONCLUSIONS: In surgical dermatology, each case, once the tumor has been extirpated, requires its own reconstructive technique. The radial free flap is suitable for thin patients who are willing to cover their arm with a shirt. The rectus abdominis free flap is best suited for obese patients with deep and voluminous defects, although it is necessary to dislocate the navel from its original position
机译:背景:皮肤科医生通常在远处以轴向或随机方式收集带蒂皮瓣,以修复面部缺损。这些类型的皮瓣很费时间,并且具有很高的经济,社会和个人成本。通过将游离皮瓣单步转移到受体部位并进行微血管吻合可以避免这些缺陷。目的:证明使用肌皮或筋膜皮游离皮瓣可获得更好的效果,并且哪种皮瓣更适合手术皮肤科。材料和方法:我们选择了两名接受Mohs手术的异性和相似年龄的患者,以清除位于骨区附近的上颊的复发性恶性肿瘤。这名妇女接受了筋膜皮肤放射状游离皮瓣的治疗,该男子接受了腹直肌游离皮瓣的治疗。结果:两名患者均具有优异的即时术后效果。在男性患者中观察到的并发症与先前的肺部改变有关。筋膜皮肤radial动脉游离皮瓣的重建比腹直肌游离皮瓣更容易实施;但是,径向游离瓣非常薄,尽管使用了掌长肌腱,但它的体积不足,需要以后再使用植入物。相比之下,腹直肌游离皮瓣可转移具有足够脂肪组织的宽皮瓣,以备将来使用。至于供体部位的美容效果,无腹直肌皮瓣会产生更好看的疤痕,因为手掌表面的继发性缺陷无法直接闭合,通常需要进行移植-有些患者不接受这种情况。结论:在外科皮肤病学中,一旦切除肿瘤,每种情况都需要使用自己的重建技术。径向游离瓣适合于愿意用衬衫遮住手臂的瘦弱患者。腹直肌游离皮瓣最适合患有深部和大量缺损的肥胖患者,尽管有必要将肚脐从其原始位置移位

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号