首页> 外文期刊>American journal of public health >Spatial Access to Syringe Exchange Programs and Pharmacies Selling Over-the-Counter Syringes as Predictors of Drug Injectors' Use of Sterile Syringes
【24h】

Spatial Access to Syringe Exchange Programs and Pharmacies Selling Over-the-Counter Syringes as Predictors of Drug Injectors' Use of Sterile Syringes

机译:空间使用注射器交换程序和出售非处方注射器的药房作为注射毒品者使用无菌注射器的预测因素

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives. We examined relationships of spatial access to syringe exchange programs (SEPs) and pharmacies selling over-the-counter (OTC) syringes with New York City drug injectors’ harm reduction practices. Methods. Each year from 1995 to 2006, we measured the percentage of 42 city health districts’ surface area that was within 1 mile of an SEP or OTC pharmacy. We applied hierarchical generalized linear models to investigate relationships between these exposures and the odds that injectors (n = 4003) used a sterile syringe for at least 75% of injections in the past 6 months. Results . A 1-unit increase in the natural log of the percentage of a district's surface area within a mile of an SEP in 1995 was associated with a 26% increase in the odds of injecting with a sterile syringe; a 1-unit increase in this exposure over time increased these odds 23%. A 1-unit increase in the natural log of OTC pharmacy access improved these odds 15%. Conclusions . Greater spatial access to SEPs and OTC pharmacies improved injectors’ capacity to engage in harm reduction practices that reduce HIV and HCV transmission. Research indicates that individuals who live closer to mental health and primary care clinics are more likely to use these services. 1 – 5 Accordingly, the US Department of Health and Human Services and other public health agencies promote easy spatial access to health care service sites in small geographic areas (e.g., clusters of census tracts). 6 , 7 Syringe exchange programs (SEPs) and pharmacies that sell syringes without a prescription, or over the counter (OTC), are health care services that substantially increase the likelihood that drug injectors will use sterile syringes, thus reducing their probability of becoming infected with HIV, HCV, and possibly other injection-related bacterial infections. 8 – 19 Multiple studies have concluded that the prevalence of injection-related HIV and related risk behaviors is higher in nations, states, and other large geographic areas with poor spatial access to SEPs or OTC pharmacies, 9 , 20 – 25 but little research has focused on the impact of spatial access to SEPs and OTC pharmacies in small geographic areas on local injectors’ injection practices and rates of injection-related infection. Spatial access to SEPs and OTC pharmacies often varies across small geographic areas within a city, metropolitan area, or state. Municipal ordinances may prohibit SEPs from operating within a specific distance of a school or park, and local opposition may prevent a new SEP from opening in a neighborhood or may force an existing SEP to close. 26 – 28 Some states permit pharmacies to choose whether to sell OTC syringes, and the distribution of pharmacies themselves across neighborhoods is uneven. 29 – 31 The few studies of local access to SEPs have found that, as with other health services, 1 – 5 proximity increases utilization. 32 – 35 For example, Rockwell et al. found that injectors living within a 10-minute travel distance of an SEP in New York City in 1993 were almost 3 times as likely as other injectors to attend an SEP and half as likely to report injecting with used syringes. 33 A recent study, however, found no relationship between OTC pharmacy access and injection-related behaviors among injectors living within 1 kilometer of a pharmacy. 34 Quantifying the effect of spatial access to SEPs on injection practices in local areas is particularly pressing now. After decades of withholding federal funds from SEPs, the US Congress in 2009 approved an appropriations bill permitting federal funding of SEPs. These funds could permit new SEPs to open and allow existing SEPs to add sites. As the appropriations bill underwent congressional review, the geographic location of federally funded SEPs became a source of debate. The House version of the bill restricted federal funding to SEPs located more than 1000 feet from an educational institution, public recreation area, “or an event sponsored by any such entity.” 36 (sec523) The Senate version contained no geographic restrictions. The final appropriations bill shifts decisions about SEP locations to local governments: the bill prohibits granting federal funds to SEPs located in sites “that local public health or law enforcement agencies determine to be inappropriate.” 37 (p8) Research on the effect of spatial access to SEPs on injection practices may inform local advocacy and decisions about which SEP sites may receive federal funding. We conducted a longitudinal (1995–2006) multilevel analysis of whether variations in spatial access to SEPs and OTC pharmacies across New York City health districts affected the likelihood that local injectors used sterile syringes. Although state law required a prescription to purchase a syringe throughout the study period, syringe access has evolved over time. St
机译:目标。我们研究了使用注射器交换程序(SEP)和销售非处方(OTC)注射器的药房与纽约市注射剂的减少危害做法在空间上的关系。方法。从1995年到2006年,我们每年测量42个城市医疗区的表面积所占百分比,这些区域位于SEP或OTC药房的1英里范围内。我们应用分层广义线性模型来研究这些暴露与过去6个月中注射器(n = 4003)至少使用75%的注射器使用无菌注射器的几率之间的关系。结果。 1995年,在SEP英里以内的地区表面积百分比的自然对数增加1个单位,则用无菌注射器注射的几率增加26%。暴露量每增加1个单位,这些几率就会增加23%。 OTC药房获取自然对数增加了1个单位,这些几率提高了15%。结论。 SEP和OTC药房的更多空间使用,提高了注射者参与减少危害措施的能力,以减少HIV和HCV的传播。研究表明,居住在精神卫生和初级保健诊所附近的人更可能使用这些服务。 1 – 5 因此,美国卫生与公共服务部和其他公共卫生机构倡导在空间上更方便 6,7 出售无处方或非处方注射器的注射器交换程序(SEP)和药房(OTC) ),是可以大大提高药物注射器使用无菌注射器的可能性,从而降低其感染HIV,HCV和其他可能与注射有关的细菌感染的可能性的医疗保健服务。 8 – 19 多项研究得出结论,在与SEP或OTC药房接触不到的国家,州和其他较大的地理区域中,与注射有关的HIV和相关风险行为的患病率更高, 9,20 – 25 但很少有研究集中于在较小地理区域中空间获取SEP和OTC药房对本地注射者的注射方式和注射相关感染率的影响。在城市,都会区或州内的较小地理区域中,获取SEP和OTC药房的空间通常不同。市政条例可能会禁止SEP在学校或公园的特定距离内运行,而当地反对派可能会阻止在附近开设新的SEP或迫使现有的SEP关闭。 26 – 28 有些各州允许药房选择是否出售OTC注射器,而且药房本身在社区中的分布也不均匀。 29 – 31 很少有关于本地获得SEP的研究发现,与其他医疗服务一样, 1 – 5 邻近度可提高利用率。 32 – 35 例如,Rockwell等。发现1993年在纽约市居住在距SEP 10分钟路程范围内的注射器几乎是其他参加SEP的注射器的3倍,而报告用过的注射器进行注射的可能性则是其一半。 33 然而,最近的一项研究发现,居住在距离药房1公里以内的注射器中,OTC药房使用与注射相关行为之间没有关系。 34 量化SEP的空间使用对注射方式的影响现在当地特别紧迫。在几十年内从SEP扣留联邦资金后,美国国会于2009年批准了一项拨款法案,允许联邦政府为SEP提供资金。这些资金可以允许新的SEP打开,并允许现有的SEP添加站点。随着拨款法案接受国会审查,由联邦资助的SEP的地理位置引起了争论。众议院版本的法案将联邦资金限制在距离教育机构,公共娱乐区或任何此类实体主办的活动超过1000英尺的SEP。 36(sec523)参议院版本没有地域限制。最终拨款法案将有关SEP位置的决定移交给地方政府:该法案禁止向位于“当地公共卫生或执法机构认为不合适的场所”的SEP授予联邦资金。 37(p8)有关SEP空间访问对注射实践的影响的研究可能会为当地的倡导和决策提供依据,以决定哪些SEP场所可能获得联邦资助。我们进行了纵向(1995-2006年)多层次分析,分析了纽约市卫生区SEP和OTC药房的空间使用情况变化是否影响了本地注射器使用无菌注射器的可能性。尽管州法律要求在整个研究期间购买注射器都需要处方,但随着时间的流逝,注射器的使用也在不断发展。圣

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号